more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 20438

[filed under theme 21. Aesthetics / B. Nature of Art / 7. Ontology of Art ]

Full Idea

The most miserable performance without actual mistakes does count as an instance of a work, …but the most brilliant performance with a single wrong note does not.

Gist of Idea

A performance is only an instance of a work if there is not a single error

Source

Nelson Goodman (Languages of Art (2nd edn) [1968], p.186), quoted by Alessandro Giovannelli - Nelson Goodman (aesthetics)

Book Ref

'Key Thinkers in Aesthetics', ed/tr. Giovannelli,Alessandro [Continuum 2012], p.174


A Reaction

Mereological essentialism applied to art! You need to be a highly theoretical and technical philosopher (which Goodman was) to maintain such a weird and contrary-usage proposal.

Related Ideas

Idea 15512 In mereology no two things consist of the same atoms [Lewis]

Idea 12875 One false note doesn't make it a performance of a different work [Simons]


The 9 ideas with the same theme [in what sense varies types of art actually exist]:

Art exists ideally, purely as experiences in the mind of the perceiver [Collingwood, by Kemp]
A performance is only an instance of a work if there is not a single error [Goodman]
If artworks are not physical objects, they are either ideal entities, or collections of phenomena [Wollheim]
The ideal theory says art is an intuition, shaped by a particular process, and presented in public [Wollheim]
The ideal theory of art neglects both the audience and the medium employed [Wollheim]
A musical performance has virtually the same features as the piece of music [Wollheim]
Art works originate in the artist's mind, and appreciation is re-creating this mental object [Gardner]
If paintings could be perfectly duplicated, it would be a multiple art form [Currie, by Bacharach]
The dualistic view says works of art are either abstract objects (types), or physical objects [Lamarque/Olson]