more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 9647

[filed under theme 6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 2. Proof in Mathematics ]

Full Idea

The celebrity of the famous proof in 1976 of the four-colour theorem of maps is that a computer played an essential role in the proof.

Clarification

What is the minimum number of colours needed for a good map?

Gist of Idea

Computers played an essential role in proving the four-colour theorem of maps

Source

James Robert Brown (Philosophy of Mathematics [1999], Ch.10)

Book Ref

Brown,James Robert: 'Philosophy of Mathematics' [Routledge 2002], p.154


A Reaction

The problem concerns the reliability of the computers, but then all the people who check a traditional proof might also be unreliable. Quis custodet custodies?


The 33 ideas from James Robert Brown

If a proposition is false, then its negation is true [Brown,JR]
Mathematics is the only place where we are sure we are right [Brown,JR]
The irrationality of root-2 was achieved by intellect, not experience [Brown,JR]
Numbers are not abstracted from particulars, because each number is a particular [Brown,JR]
There is an infinity of mathematical objects, so they can't be physical [Brown,JR]
There are no constructions for many highly desirable results in mathematics [Brown,JR]
'Abstract' nowadays means outside space and time, not concrete, not physical [Brown,JR]
The older sense of 'abstract' is where 'redness' or 'group' is abstracted from particulars [Brown,JR]
Nowadays conditions are only defined on existing sets [Brown,JR]
Naïve set theory assumed that there is a set for every condition [Brown,JR]
The 'iterative' view says sets start with the empty set and build up [Brown,JR]
David's 'Napoleon' is about something concrete and something abstract [Brown,JR]
Empiricists base numbers on objects, Platonists base them on properties [Brown,JR]
'There are two apples' can be expressed logically, with no mention of numbers [Brown,JR]
Mathematics represents the world through structurally similar models. [Brown,JR]
To see a structure in something, we must already have the idea of the structure [Brown,JR]
Sets seem basic to mathematics, but they don't suit structuralism [Brown,JR]
Set theory says that natural numbers are an actual infinity (to accommodate their powerset) [Brown,JR]
Berry's Paradox finds a contradiction in the naming of huge numbers [Brown,JR]
The most brilliant formalist was Hilbert [Brown,JR]
For nomalists there are no numbers, only numerals [Brown,JR]
Given atomism at one end, and a finite universe at the other, there are no physical infinities [Brown,JR]
A term can have not only a sense and a reference, but also a 'computational role' [Brown,JR]
Does some mathematics depend entirely on notation? [Brown,JR]
Set theory may represent all of mathematics, without actually being mathematics [Brown,JR]
When graphs are defined set-theoretically, that won't cover unlabelled graphs [Brown,JR]
Definitions should be replaceable by primitives, and should not be creative [Brown,JR]
A flock of birds is not a set, because a set cannot go anywhere [Brown,JR]
Constructivists say p has no value, if the value depends on Goldbach's Conjecture [Brown,JR]
There is no limit to how many ways something can be proved in mathematics [Brown,JR]
Computers played an essential role in proving the four-colour theorem of maps [Brown,JR]
π is a 'transcendental' number, because it is not the solution of an equation [Brown,JR]
Axioms are either self-evident, or stipulations, or fallible attempts [Brown,JR]