more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 10264

[filed under theme 6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 10. Constructivism / a. Constructivism ]

Full Idea

Chihara has proposal a modal primitive, a 'constructability quantifier'. Syntactically it behaves like an ordinary quantifier: Φ is a formula, and x a variable. Then (Cx)Φ is a formula, read as 'it is possible to construct an x such that Φ'.

Gist of Idea

Introduce a constructibility quantifiers (Cx)Φ - 'it is possible to construct an x such that Φ'

Source

report of Charles Chihara (Constructibility and Mathematical Existence [1990]) by Stewart Shapiro - Philosophy of Mathematics 7.4

Book Ref

Shapiro,Stewart: 'Philosophy of Mathematics:structure and ontology' [OUP 1997], p.230


A Reaction

We only think natural numbers are infinite because we see no barrier to continuing to count, i.e. to construct new numbers. We accept reals when we know how to construct them. Etc. Sounds promising to me (though not to Shapiro).


The 22 ideas from Charles Chihara

We could talk of open sentences, instead of sets [Chihara, by Shapiro]
Chihara's system is a variant of type theory, from which he can translate sentences [Chihara, by Shapiro]
We can replace type theory with open sentences and a constructibility quantifier [Chihara, by Shapiro]
Introduce a constructibility quantifiers (Cx)Φ - 'it is possible to construct an x such that Φ' [Chihara, by Shapiro]
Could we replace sets by the open sentences that define them? [Chihara, by Bostock]
We can replace existence of sets with possibility of constructing token sentences [Chihara, by MacBride]
Mathematical entities are causally inert, so the causal theory of reference won't work for them [Chihara]
The set theorist cannot tell us what 'membership' is [Chihara]
What is special about Bill Clinton's unit set, in comparison with all the others? [Chihara]
We only know relational facts about the empty set, but nothing intrinsic [Chihara]
Sentences are consistent if they can all be true; for Frege it is that no contradiction can be deduced [Chihara]
Analytic geometry gave space a mathematical structure, which could then have axioms [Chihara]
If a successful theory confirms mathematics, presumably a failed theory disconfirms it? [Chihara]
The mathematics of relations is entirely covered by ordered pairs [Chihara]
In simple type theory there is a hierarchy of null sets [Chihara]
A pack of wolves doesn't cease when one member dies [Chihara]
No scientific explanation would collapse if mathematical objects were shown not to exist [Chihara]
I prefer the open sentences of a Constructibility Theory, to Platonist ideas of 'equivalence classes' [Chihara]
ZFU refers to the physical world, when it talks of 'urelements' [Chihara]
Realists about sets say there exists a null set in the real world, with no members [Chihara]
The null set is a structural position which has no other position in membership relation [Chihara]
'Gunk' is an individual possessing no parts that are atoms [Chihara]