more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 8958

[filed under theme 6. Mathematics / A. Nature of Mathematics / 3. Nature of Numbers / a. Numbers ]

Full Idea

Field's nominalist version of science develops a version of Newtonian gravitational theory, where no quantifiers range over mathematical entities, and space-time points and regions play the role of surrogates for real numbers.

Gist of Idea

In Field's version of science, space-time points replace real numbers

Source

report of Hartry Field (Science without Numbers [1980]) by Zoltán Gendler Szabó - Nominalism 5.1

Book Ref

'The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics', ed/tr. Loux,M /Zimmerman,D [OUP 2005], p.36


A Reaction

This seems to be a very artificial contrivance, but Field has launched a programme for rewriting science so that numbers can be omitted. All of this is Field's rebellion against the Indispensability Argument for mathematics. I sympathise.


The 21 ideas from 'Science without Numbers'

In Field's Platonist view, set theory is false because it asserts existence for non-existent things [Field,H, by Chihara]
Logical consequence is defined by the impossibility of P and ¬q [Field,H, by Shapiro]
In Field's version of science, space-time points replace real numbers [Field,H, by Szabó]
The application of mathematics only needs its possibility, not its truth [Field,H, by Shapiro]
Field presumes properties can be eliminated from science [Field,H, by Szabó]
Nominalists try to only refer to physical objects, or language, or mental constructions [Field,H]
Abstract objects are only applicable to the world if they are impure, and connect to the physical [Field,H]
It seems impossible to explain the idea that the conclusion is contained in the premises [Field,H]
Mathematics is only empirical as regards which theory is useful [Field,H]
Abstractions can form useful counterparts to concrete statements [Field,H]
Hilbert explains geometry, by non-numerical facts about space [Field,H]
Both philosophy and physics now make substantivalism more attractive [Field,H]
Relational space is problematic if you take the idea of a field seriously [Field,H]
Beneath every extrinsic explanation there is an intrinsic explanation [Field,H]
'Metric' axioms uses functions, points and numbers; 'synthetic' axioms give facts about space [Field,H]
Field needs a semantical notion of second-order consequence, and that needs sets [Brown,JR on Field,H]
In theories of fields, space-time points or regions are causal agents [Field,H]
'Abstract' is unclear, but numbers, functions and sets are clearly abstract [Field,H]
The Indispensability Argument is the only serious ground for the existence of mathematical entities [Field,H]
You can reduce ontological commitment by expanding the logic [Field,H]
Why regard standard mathematics as truths, rather than as interesting fictions? [Field,H]