more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 15162

[filed under theme 10. Modality / A. Necessity / 5. Metaphysical Necessity ]

Full Idea

Our understanding of metaphysical necessity is intuitive - drawn from our ordinary thought and talk.

Gist of Idea

We understand metaphysical necessity intuitively, from ordinary life

Source

Scott Soames (Philosophy of Language [2010], 3.1)

Book Ref

Soames,Scott: 'Philosophy of Language' [Princeton 2010], p.53


A Reaction

This, of course, is a good reason for analytic philosophers to dislike metaphysical necessity.


The 17 ideas from Scott Soames

Analytic philosophy loved the necessary a priori analytic, linguistic modality, and rigour [Soames]
Kripkean possible worlds are abstract maximal states in which the real world could have been [Soames]
Kripkean essential properties and relations are necessary, in all genuinely possible worlds [Soames]
Two-dimensionalism reinstates descriptivism, and reconnects necessity and apriority to analyticity [Soames]
A key achievement of Kripke is showing that important modalities are not linguistic in source [Soames]
If philosophy is analysis of meaning, available to all competent speakers, what's left for philosophers? [Soames]
We should use cognitive states to explain representational propositions, not vice versa [Soames]
To study meaning, study truth conditions, on the basis of syntax, and representation by the parts [Soames]
Tarski's account of truth-conditions is too weak to determine meanings [Soames]
Recognising the definite description 'the man' as a quantifier phrase, not a singular term, is a real insight [Soames]
The universal and existential quantifiers were chosen to suit mathematics [Soames]
Indefinite descriptions are quantificational in subject position, but not in predicate position [Soames]
There are more metaphysically than logically necessary truths [Soames]
We understand metaphysical necessity intuitively, from ordinary life [Soames]
The interest of quantified modal logic is its metaphysical necessity and essentialism [Soames]
Semantic content is a proposition made of sentence constituents (not some set of circumstances) [Soames]
Semantics as theory of meaning and semantics as truth-based logical consequence are very different [Soames]