more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
Our understanding of metaphysical necessity is intuitive - drawn from our ordinary thought and talk.
Gist of Idea
We understand metaphysical necessity intuitively, from ordinary life
Source
Scott Soames (Philosophy of Language [2010], 3.1)
Book Ref
Soames,Scott: 'Philosophy of Language' [Princeton 2010], p.53
A Reaction
This, of course, is a good reason for analytic philosophers to dislike metaphysical necessity.
| 15152 | To study meaning, study truth conditions, on the basis of syntax, and representation by the parts [Soames] |
| 15153 | Tarski's account of truth-conditions is too weak to determine meanings [Soames] |
| 15154 | We should use cognitive states to explain representational propositions, not vice versa [Soames] |
| 15157 | Recognising the definite description 'the man' as a quantifier phrase, not a singular term, is a real insight [Soames] |
| 15156 | The universal and existential quantifiers were chosen to suit mathematics [Soames] |
| 15158 | Indefinite descriptions are quantificational in subject position, but not in predicate position [Soames] |
| 15163 | The interest of quantified modal logic is its metaphysical necessity and essentialism [Soames] |
| 15162 | We understand metaphysical necessity intuitively, from ordinary life [Soames] |
| 15161 | There are more metaphysically than logically necessary truths [Soames] |