more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 15232

[filed under theme 10. Modality / A. Necessity / 7. Natural Necessity ]

Full Idea

When the natures of the operative powerful particulars, the constraining or stimulating effect of conditions and so on are offered as the grounds for the judgement that a certain effect cannot but happen (or fail), we have natural necessity.

Gist of Idea

Natural necessity is when powerful particulars must produce certain results in a situation

Source

Harré,R./Madden,E.H. (Causal Powers [1975], 1.V.B)

Book Ref

Harré,R/Madden,E.H.: 'Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity' [Blackwell 1975], p.20


A Reaction

This is the view I subscribe to, the really right bit of scientific essentialism. Can this view be proved? Hm. I take the opposite view to be the misguided Humean idea that if you can imagine it not happening, then it might not happen. Firey furnace.


The 18 ideas with the same theme [necessary facts about the physical world]:

The world is physically necessary, as its contrary would imply imperfection or moral absurdity [Leibniz]
Natural necessity is the unconditioned necessity of appearances [Kant]
Laws of nature remain the same through any conditions, if the underlying mechanisms are unchanged [Harré]
Instead of being regularities, maybe natural laws are the weak a posteriori necessities of Kripke [Kripke, by Psillos]
Physical necessity may be necessity in the highest degree [Kripke]
What many people consider merely physically necessary I consider completely necessary [Kripke]
What is often held to be mere physical necessity is actually metaphysical necessity [Kripke]
Natural necessity is not logical necessity or empirical contingency in disguise [Harré/Madden]
The relation between what a thing is and what it can do or undergo relate by natural necessity [Harré/Madden]
A necessity corresponds to the nature of the actual [Harré/Madden]
Natural necessity is when powerful particulars must produce certain results in a situation [Harré/Madden]
People doubt science because if it isn't logically necessary it seems to be absolutely contingent [Harré/Madden]
Property or event relations are naturally necessary if generated by essential mechanisms [Harré/Madden]
Causal necessities hold in all worlds compatible with the laws of nature [Lewis]
Because 'gold is malleable' is necessary does not mean that it is analytic [Audi,R]
Nomological necessity is expressed with intransitive relations in modal semantics [Salmon,N]
Nomological necessity is truth in all logically possible worlds with our laws [Hanna]
Relations are naturally necessary when they are generated by the essential mechanisms of the world [Mumford/Anjum]