more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 14081

[filed under theme 9. Objects / F. Identity among Objects / 6. Identity between Objects ]

Full Idea

There can be determinately true identity claims despite indeterminate reference of the terms flanking the identity sign; these will be identity claims true under all admissible interpretations of the flanking terms.

Gist of Idea

Identities can be true despite indeterminate reference, if true under all interpretations

Source

Jonathan Schaffer (Deflationary Metaontology of Thomasson [2009], 3.1)

Book Ref

-: 'Philosophical Books' [-], p.147


A Reaction

In informal contexts there might be problems with the notion of what is 'admissible'. Is 'my least favourite physical object' admissible?


The 20 ideas with the same theme [two objects turning out to be one object]:

Two things relate either as same or different, or part of a whole, or the whole of the part [Plato]
Carneades denied the transitivity of identity [Carneades, by Chisholm]
Identity between objects is not a consequence of identity, but part of what 'identity' means [Frege, by Dummett]
Identity of physical objects is just being coextensive [Quine]
Identity statements can be contingent if they rely on descriptions [Kripke]
If Hesperus and Phosophorus are the same, they can't possibly be different [Kripke]
Identity statements make sense only if there are possible individuating conditions [Benacerraf]
There can't be vague identity; a and b must differ, since a, unlike b, is only vaguely the same as b [Evans, by PG]
A is necessarily A, so if B is A, then B is also necessarily A [Wiggins]
Claims on contingent identity seem to violate Leibniz's Law [Gibbard]
Two things can never be identical, so there is no problem [Lewis]
All identity is necessary, though identity statements can be contingently true [McGinn]
'Lightning is electric discharge' and 'Phosphorus is Venus' are synthetic a posteriori identities [Lycan]
We would understand identity between objects, even if their existence was impossible [Fine,K]
If two things are equal, each side involves a necessity, so the equality is necessary [Gallois]
Occasional Identity: two objects can be identical at one time, and different at others [Gallois, by Hawley]
Identities can be true despite indeterminate reference, if true under all interpretations [Schaffer,J]
Identity statements are informative if they link separate mental files [Recanati]
Identical entities must be of the same category, and meet the criteria for the category [Thomasson]
Identity claims between objects are only well-formed if the categories are specified [Thomasson]