more from this thinker     |     more from this text

Single Idea 12699

[filed under theme 9. Objects / B. Unity of Objects / 1. Unifying an Object / b. Unifying aggregates ]

Full Idea

Without soul or form of some kind, a body would have no being, because no part of it can be designated which does not in turn consist of more parts. Thus nothing could be designated in a body which could be called 'this thing', or a unity.

Gist of Idea

A body would be endless disunited parts, if it did not have a unifying form or soul

Source

Gottfried Leibniz (Conspectus libelli (book outline) [1678], A6.4.1988), quoted by Daniel Garber - Leibniz:Body,Substance,Monad 1

Book Ref

Garber,Daniel: 'Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad' [OUP 2009], p.51

A Reaction

The locution 'soul or form' is disconcerting, and you have to spend some time with Leibniz to get the hang of it. The 'soul' is not intelligent, and is more like a source of action and response.

The 18 ideas with the same theme [whether a mere assemblage of parts can be unified]:

3357 Democritus denies reality to large objects, because atomic entities can't combine to produce new ones [Benardete,JA on Democritus]
15851 Parts must belong to a created thing with a distinct form [Plato]
13272 Things are one to the extent that they are indivisible [Aristotle]
17842 Indivisibility is the cause of unity, either in movement, or in the account or thought [Aristotle]
17860 Things are unified by contact, mixture and position [Aristotle]
14046 A 'body' is a conception of an aggregate, with properties defined by application conditions [Epicurus]
17555 'One' can mean undivided and not a multitude, or it can add measurement, giving number [Aquinas]
16770 It is absurd that there is no difference between a genuinely unified thing, and a mere aggregate [Duns Scotus]
17248 If a whole body is moved, its parts must move with it [Hobbes]
17188 A thing is unified if its parts produce a single effect [Spinoza]
17028 Particles mutually attract, and cohere at short distances [Newton]
12699 A body would be endless disunited parts, if it did not have a unifying form or soul [Leibniz]
12921 Accidental unity has degrees, from a mob to a society to a machine or organism [Leibniz]
14112 A set has some sort of unity, but not enough to be a 'whole' [Russell]
17571 Every physical thing is either a living organism or a simple [Inwagen]
16072 'The rock' either refers to an object, or to a collection of parts, or to some stuff [Burke,M, by Wasserman]
10726 Things can't be fusions of universals, because two things could then be one thing [Oliver]
10725 Abstract sets of universals can't be bundled to make concrete things [Oliver]