more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 14076

[filed under theme 9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 7. Essence and Necessity / a. Essence as necessary properties ]

Full Idea

Essentialism for a class of entities is that for one entity and a condition which it fulfills, the question of whether it necessarily fulfills the condition has a definite answer apart from the way the entity is specified.

Gist of Idea

Essentialism is the existence of a definite answer as to whether an entity fulfils a condition

Source

Allan Gibbard (Contingent Identity [1975], VII)

Book Ref

-: 'Journal of Symbolic Logic' [-], p.207


A Reaction

Yet another definition of essentialism, but resting, as usual in modern discussions, entirely on the notion of necessity. Kit Fine's challenge is that if you investigate the source of the necessity, it turns out to be an essence.

Related Idea

Idea 14077 Essentialism for concreta is false, since they can come apart under two concepts [Gibbard]


The 14 ideas from Allan Gibbard

If a statue is identical with the clay of which it is made, that identity is contingent [Gibbard]
A 'piece' of clay begins when its parts stick together, separately from other clay [Gibbard]
Clay and statue are two objects, which can be named and reasoned about [Gibbard]
Two identical things must share properties - including creation and destruction times [Gibbard]
A particular statue has sortal persistence conditions, so its origin defines it [Gibbard]
We can only investigate the identity once we have designated it as 'statue' or as 'clay' [Gibbard]
Naming a thing in the actual world also invokes some persistence criteria [Gibbard]
Possible worlds identity needs a sortal [Gibbard]
Claims on contingent identity seem to violate Leibniz's Law [Gibbard]
Leibniz's Law isn't just about substitutivity, because it must involve properties and relations [Gibbard]
Essentialism is the existence of a definite answer as to whether an entity fulfils a condition [Gibbard]
Essentialism for concreta is false, since they can come apart under two concepts [Gibbard]
Only concepts, not individuals, can be the same across possible worlds [Gibbard]
Kripke's semantics needs lots of intuitions about which properties are essential [Gibbard]