more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 12080

[filed under theme 2. Reason / D. Definition / 6. Definition by Essence ]

Full Idea

Aristotle never thought of an essence as comprising all the necessary properties of an object. In Met VII.4 he limits per se predication appropriate to essences to the definition, and in Topics he distinguishes definition from the 'proprium'.

Clarification

'Proprium' translates 'idion', and means non-essential properties

Gist of Idea

Essence is not all the necessary properties, since these extend beyond the definition

Source

report of Aristotle (Metaphysics [c.324 BCE]) by Charlotte Witt - Substance and Essence in Aristotle 4.1

Book Ref

Witt,Charlotte: 'Substance and Essence in Aristotle' [Cornell 1994], p.106


A Reaction

[Topics 102a20-25] There seems to be consensus among scholars about this, and only a few misguided modern metaphysicians identify essences with the necessary properties (or maybe the non-trivial necessary properties).


The 14 ideas with the same theme [essence as what figures in a successful definition]:

Socrates sought essences, which are the basis of formal logic [Socrates, by Aristotle]
Essence is not all the necessary properties, since these extend beyond the definition [Aristotle, by Witt]
A definition is an account of a what-it-was-to-be-that-thing [Aristotle]
What it is and why it is are the same; screening defines and explains an eclipse [Aristotle]
The definition is peculiar to one thing, not common to many [Aristotle]
Maybe Locke described the real essence of a person [Locke, by Pasnau]
If definitions aim at different ideals, then defining essence is not a unitary activity [Gupta]
Defining a term and giving the essence of an object don't just resemble - they are the same [Fine,K]
The essence or definition of an essence involves either a class of properties or a class of propositions [Fine,K]
A definition of a circle will show what it is, and show its generating principle [Lowe]
Defining an ellipse by conic sections reveals necessities, but not the essence of an ellipse [Lowe]
An essence is what an entity is, revealed by a real definition; this is not an entity in its own right [Lowe]
A canonical defintion specifies the type of thing, and what distinguish this specimen [Hale]
Essences cause necessary features, and definitions describe those necessary features [Koslicki]