more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 16520

[filed under theme 9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 3. Individual Essences ]

Full Idea

We can significantly ask what properties it is necessary for something to possess in order to be a thing of such and such a kind, since that asks what properties enter into the definition of the kind. But there is no such definition of the individual.

Gist of Idea

We see properties necessary for a kind (in the definition), but not for an individual

Source

A.J. Ayer (The Central Questions of Philosophy [1973], 9.A.5)

Book Ref

Ayer,A.J.: 'The Central Questions of Philosophy' [Penguin 1976], p.197


A Reaction

[Quoted, not surprisingly, by Wiggins] Illuminating. If essence is just about necessary properties, I begin to see why the sortal might be favoured. I take it to concern explanatory mechanisms, and hence the individual.


The 85 ideas from A.J. Ayer

Moral theories are all meta-ethical, and are neutral as regards actual conduct [Ayer]
Some people think there are ethical facts, but of a 'queer' sort [Ayer]
Approval of historical or fictional murders gives us leave to imitate them [Ayer]
Moral judgements are not expressions, but are elements in a behaviour pattern [Ayer]
I would describe intuitions of good as feelings of approval [Ayer]
A right attitude is just an attitude one is prepared to stand by [Ayer]
Moral judgements cannot be the logical consequence of a moral philosophy [Ayer]
Self-consciousness is not basic, because experiences are not instrinsically marked with ownership [Ayer]
Is something an 'experience' because it relates to other experiences, or because it relates to a subject? [Ayer]
Qualia must be united by a subject, because they lead to concepts and judgements [Ayer]
Bodily identity and memory work together to establish personal identity [Ayer]
Temporal gaps in the consciousness of a spirit could not be bridged by memories [Ayer]
Why shouldn't we say brain depends on mind? Better explanation! [Ayer]
Originally I combined a mentalistic view of introspection with a behaviouristic view of other minds [Ayer]
Physicalism undercuts the other mind problem, by equating experience with 'public' brain events [Ayer]
The theory of other minds has no rival [Ayer]
You can't infer that because you have a hidden birth-mark, everybody else does [Ayer]
We see properties necessary for a kind (in the definition), but not for an individual [Ayer]
It is currently held that quantifying over something implies belief in its existence [Ayer]
Talk of propositions is just shorthand for talking about equivalent sentences [Ayer]
Maybe induction could never prove the existence of something unobservable [Ayer]
We identify experiences by their owners, so we can't define owners by their experiences [Ayer]
Memory is the best proposal as what unites bundles of experiences [Ayer]
Personal identity can't just be relations of experiences, because the body is needed to identify them [Ayer]
People own conscious states because they are causally related to the identifying body [Ayer]
Not all exerience can be remembered, as this would produce an infinite regress [Ayer]
Consciousness must involve a subject, and only bodies identify subjects [Ayer]
No one has defended translational phenomenalism since Ayer in 1940 [Ayer, by Kim]
The attribution of necessity to causation is either primitive animism, or confusion with logical necessity [Ayer]
Sentences only express propositions if they are meaningful; otherwise they are 'statements' [Ayer]
Basic propositions refer to a single experience, are incorrigible, and conclusively verifiable [Ayer]
A statement is meaningful if observation statements can be deduced from it [Ayer]
Directly verifiable statements must entail at least one new observation statement [Ayer]
The principle of verification is not an empirical hypothesis, but a definition [Ayer]
The argument from analogy fails, so the best account of other minds is behaviouristic [Ayer]
Moral approval and disapproval concerns classes of actions, rather than particular actions [Ayer]
Positivists prefer sense-data to objects, because the vocabulary covers both illusions and perceptions [Ayer, by Robinson,H]
Empiricism lacked a decent account of the a priori, until Ayer said it was entirely analytic [O'Grady on Ayer]
Logical positivists could never give the sense-data equivalent of 'there is a table next door' [Robinson,H on Ayer]
Positivists regard ontology as either meaningless or stipulated [Ayer, by Robinson,H]
Humeans rejected the a priori synthetic, and so rejected even Kantian metaphysics [Ayer, by Macdonald,C]
Philosophy deals with the questions that scientists do not wish to handle [Ayer]
Only tautologies can be certain; other propositions can only be probable [Ayer]
All propositions (especially 'metaphysics') must begin with the senses [Ayer]
It is further sense-experience which informs us of the mistakes that arise out of sense-experience [Ayer]
A sentence is factually significant to someone if they know how to verify its proposition [Ayer]
Factual propositions imply (in conjunction with a few other premises) possible experiences [Ayer]
Tautologies and empirical hypotheses form the entire class of significant propositions [Ayer]
When we ascribe an attribute to a thing, we covertly assert that it exists [Ayer]
The induction problem is to prove generalisations about the future based on the past [Ayer]
We can't use the uniformity of nature to prove induction, as that would be circular [Ayer]
Causal and representative theories of perception are wrong as they refer to unobservables [Ayer]
We could verify 'a thing can't be in two places at once' by destroying one of the things [Ierubino on Ayer]
By changing definitions we could make 'a thing can't be in two places at once' a contradiction [Ayer]
Critics say analysis can only show the parts, and not their distinctive configuration [Ayer]
Philosophy is a department of logic [Ayer]
Philosophers should abandon speculation, as philosophy is wholly critical [Ayer]
Maths and logic are true universally because they are analytic or tautological [Ayer]
The main claim of rationalism is that thought is an independent source of knowledge [Ayer]
Whether geometry can be applied to reality is an empirical question outside of geometry [Ayer]
Empiricism, it is said, cannot account for our knowledge of necessary truths [Ayer]
To say that a proposition is true a priori is to say that it is a tautology [Ayer]
We cannot analyse the concept of 'truth', because it is simply a mark that a sentence is asserted [Ayer]
If theism is non-sensical, then so is atheism. [Ayer]
The 'truths' expressed by theists are not literally significant [Ayer]
A person with non-empirical attributes is unintelligible. [Ayer]
Ayer defends the emotivist version of expressivism [Ayer, by Smith,M]
To say an act is wrong makes no further statement about it, but merely expresses disapproval [Ayer]
Moral intuition is worthless if there is no criterion to decide between intuitions [Ayer]
The supposed 'gulf' between mind and matter is based on the senseless concept of 'substances' [Ayer]
A conscious object is by definition one that behaves in a certain way, so behaviour proves consciousness [Ayer]
Other minds are 'metaphysical' objects, because I can never observe their experiences [Ayer]
If the self is meaningful, it must be constructed from sense-experiences [Ayer]
Two experiences belong to one self if their contents belong with one body [Ayer]
Empiricists can define personal identity as bodily identity, which consists of sense-contents [Ayer]
My empiricism logically distinguishes analytic and synthetic propositions, and metaphysical verbiage [Ayer]
Material things are constructions from actual and possible occurrences of sense-contents [Ayer]
Modern phenomenalism holds that objects are logical constructions out of sense-data [Ayer]
The concept of sense-data allows us to discuss appearances without worrying about reality [Ayer]
To say 'I am not thinking' must be false, but it might have been true, so it isn't self-contradictory [Ayer]
'I know I exist' has no counterevidence, so it may be meaningless [Ayer]
Knowing I exist reveals nothing at all about my nature [Ayer]
Induction assumes some uniformity in nature, or that in some respects the future is like the past [Ayer]
We only discard a hypothesis after one failure if it appears likely to keep on failing [Ayer]
Induction passes from particular facts to other particulars, or to general laws, non-deductively [Ayer]