more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 13101

[filed under theme 9. Objects / E. Objects over Time / 12. Origin as Essential ]

Full Idea

A necessity-of-origins approach cannot work to distinguish things that come into being genuinely ex nihilo, and cannot work to distinguish things sharing a single origin.

Clarification

'Ex nihilo' means out of nothing

Gist of Idea

Necessity-of-origin won't distinguish ex nihilo creations, or things sharing an origin

Source

Cover,J/O'Leary-Hawthorne,J (Substance and Individuation in Leibniz [1999], 7.4.1)

Book Ref

Cover,J/O'Leary-Hawthorne,J: 'Substance and Individuation in Leibniz' [CUP 1999], p.271


A Reaction

Since I am deeply suspicious of essentiality or necessity of origin (and they are not, I presume, the same thing) I like these two. Twins have always bothered me with the second case (where order of birth seems irrelevant).


The 12 ideas from Cover,J/O'Leary-Hawthorne,J

We can ask for the nature of substance, about type of substance, and about individual substances [Cover/O'Leary-Hawthorne]
The general assumption is that substances cannot possibly be non-substances [Cover/O'Leary-Hawthorne]
We can go beyond mere causal explanations if we believe in an 'order of being' [Cover/O'Leary-Hawthorne]
Modern essences are sets of essential predicate-functions [Cover/O'Leary-Hawthorne]
Modern essentialists express essence as functions from worlds to extensions for predicates [Cover/O'Leary-Hawthorne]
Scholastics treat relations as two separate predicates of the relata [Cover/O'Leary-Hawthorne]
Even extreme modal realists might allow transworld identity for abstract objects [Cover/O'Leary-Hawthorne]
Maybe 'substance' is more of a mass-noun than a count-noun [Cover/O'Leary-Hawthorne]
If you individuate things by their origin, you still have to individuate the origins themselves [Cover/O'Leary-Hawthorne]
Numerical difference is a symmetrical notion, unlike proper individuation [Cover/O'Leary-Hawthorne]
Necessity-of-origin won't distinguish ex nihilo creations, or things sharing an origin [Cover/O'Leary-Hawthorne]
Haecceity as property, or as colourless thisness, or as singleton set [Cover/O'Leary-Hawthorne]