more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 18366

[filed under theme 7. Existence / C. Structure of Existence / 4. Ontological Dependence ]

Full Idea

For of things which reciprocate as to implication of existence, that which is in some way the cause of the other's existence might reasonably by called prior by nature.

Gist of Idea

Of interdependent things, the prior one causes the other's existence

Source

Aristotle (Categories [c.331 BCE], 14b12)

Book Ref

Aristotle: 'Categories and De Interpretatione', ed/tr. Ackrill,J.R. [OUP 1963], p.39


A Reaction

Not so clear when you seek examples. The bus is prior to its redness, but you can't have a colourless bus, so being coloured is prior to being a bus. Aristotle's example is a man being prior to the truths about him.

Related Idea

Idea 18367 A true existence statement has its truth caused by the existence of the thing [Aristotle]


The 17 ideas with the same theme [things that rely on other things for their existence]:

A thing is prior to another if it implies its existence [Aristotle]
Of interdependent things, the prior one causes the other's existence [Aristotle]
What is prior is always potentially present in what is next in order [Aristotle]
Prior things can exist without posterior things, but not vice versa [Aristotle]
Many of us find Frege's claim that truths depend on one another an obscure idea [Heck on Frege]
Parallelism is intuitive, so it is more fundamental than sameness of direction [Frege, by Heck]
Being primitive or prior always depends on a constructional system [Goodman]
Ontological dependence rests on essential connection, not necessary connection [Molnar]
An object is dependent if its essence prevents it from existing without some other object [Fine,K]
A natural modal account of dependence says x depends on y if y must exist when x does [Fine,K]
Dependency is the real counterpart of one term defining another [Fine,K]
An object depends on another if the second cannot be eliminated from the first's definition [Fine,K]
There is 'weak' dependence in one definition, and 'strong' dependence in all the definitions [Fine,K]
Independent objects can exist apart, and maybe even entirely alone [Simons]
There may be a one-way direction of dependence among sets, and among natural numbers [Linnebo]
Non-causal dependence is at present only dimly understood [Liggins]
There's essential, modal, explanatory, conceptual, metaphysical and constitutive dependence [Jenkins, by PG]