more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 12055

[filed under theme 9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 5. Individuation / e. Individuation by kind ]

Full Idea

Predications which answer the question 'what is x?' are often called 'sortal predications' in present-day philosophy.

Gist of Idea

Sortal predications are answers to the question 'what is x?'

Source

David Wiggins (Substance [1995], 4.10.1)

Book Ref

'Philosophy: a Guide Through the Subject', ed/tr. Grayling,A.C. [OUP 1995], p.230


A Reaction

The word 'sortal' comes from Locke. Wiggins is the guru of 'sortal essentialism'. I just can't believe that in answer to the question 'what really is David Wiggins?' that he would be happy with a sequence of categorisations.


The 83 ideas from David Wiggins

'Ultimate sortals' cannot explain ontological categories [Westerhoff on Wiggins]
What exists can't depend on our conceptual scheme, and using all conceptual schemes is too liberal [Sider on Wiggins]
We can accept criteria of distinctness and persistence, without making the counterfactual claims [Mackie,P on Wiggins]
A sortal essence is a thing's principle of individuation [Wiggins, by Mackie,P]
Wiggins's sortal essentialism rests on a thing's principle of individuation [Wiggins, by Mackie,P]
'Sortalism' says parts only compose a whole if it falls under a sort or kind [Wiggins, by Hossack]
Identity a=b is only possible with some concept to give persistence and existence conditions [Wiggins, by Strawson,P]
A thing is necessarily its highest sortal kind, which entails an essential constitution [Wiggins, by Strawson,P]
Objects can only coincide if they are of different kinds; trees can't coincide with other trees [Wiggins, by Sider]
Identity is an atemporal relation, but composition is relative to times [Wiggins, by Sider]
Relative Identity is incompatible with the Indiscernibility of Identicals [Wiggins, by Strawson,P]
The formal properties of identity are reflexivity and Leibniz's Law [Wiggins]
We learn a concept's relations by using it, without reducing it to anything [Wiggins]
We can use 'concept' for the reference, and 'conception' for sense [Wiggins]
Relativity of Identity makes identity entirely depend on a category [Wiggins]
Do both 'same f as' and '=' support Leibniz's Law? [Wiggins]
To identify two items, we must have a common sort for them [Wiggins]
Asking 'what is it?' nicely points us to the persistence of a continuing entity [Wiggins]
Identity over a time and at a time aren't different concepts [Wiggins]
The evening star is the same planet but not the same star as the morning star, since it is not a star [Wiggins]
Not every story corresponds to a possible world [Wiggins]
If I destroy an item, I do not destroy each part of it [Wiggins]
Many predicates are purely generic, or pure determiners, rather than sortals [Wiggins]
Is the Pope's crown one crown, if it is made of many crowns? [Wiggins]
Substitutivity, and hence most reasoning, needs Leibniz's Law [Wiggins]
The question is not what gets the title 'Theseus' Ship', but what is identical with the original [Wiggins]
The mind conceptualizes objects; yet objects impinge upon the mind [Wiggins]
Lawlike propensities are enough to individuate natural kinds [Wiggins]
Possible worlds rest on the objects about which we have suppositions [Wiggins]
Activity individuates natural things, functions do artefacts, and intentions do artworks [Wiggins]
(λx)[Man x] means 'the property x has iff x is a man'. [Wiggins]
We can forget about individual or particularized essences [Wiggins]
Hesperus=Hesperus, and Phosphorus=Hesperus, so necessarily Phosphorus=Hesperus [Wiggins]
The possibility of a property needs an essential sortal concept to conceive it [Wiggins]
The idea of 'thisness' is better expressed with designation/predication and particular/universal [Wiggins]
Essences are not explanations, but individuations [Wiggins]
Boundaries are not crucial to mountains, so they are determinate without a determinate extent [Wiggins]
It is easier to go from horses to horse-stages than from horse-stages to horses [Wiggins]
Essentialism is best represented as a predicate-modifier: □(a exists → a is F) [Wiggins, by Mackie,P]
The nominal essence is the idea behind a name used for sorting [Wiggins]
Individuation needs accounts of identity, of change, and of singling out [Wiggins]
Individuation can only be understood by the relation between things and thinkers [Wiggins]
The only singling out is singling out 'as' something [Wiggins]
Singling out extends back and forward in time [Wiggins]
We want to explain sameness as coincidence of substance, not as anything qualitative [Wiggins]
Maybe the concept needed under which things coincide must also yield a principle of counting [Wiggins]
Leibniz's Law (not transitivity, symmetry, reflexivity) marks what is peculiar to identity [Wiggins]
Identity cannot be defined, because definitions are identities [Wiggins]
A restored church is the same 'church', but not the same 'building' or 'brickwork' [Wiggins]
Identity is primitive [Wiggins]
'What is it?' gives the kind, nature, persistence conditions and identity over time of a thing [Wiggins]
In Aristotle's sense, saying x falls under f is to say what x is [Wiggins]
By the principle of Indiscernibility, a symmetrical object could only be half of itself! [Wiggins]
Every determinate thing falls under a sortal, which fixes its persistence [Wiggins]
The sortal needed for identities may not always be sufficient to support counting [Wiggins]
Nominal essences don't fix membership, ignore evolution, and aren't contextual [Wiggins]
Natural kinds are well suited to be the sortals which fix substances [Wiggins]
A 'conception' of a horse is a full theory of what it is (and not just the 'concept') [Wiggins]
Semantic facts are preferable to transcendental philosophical fiction [Wiggins]
Artefacts are individuated by some matter having a certain function [Wiggins]
A thing begins only once; for a clock, it is when its making is first completed [Wiggins]
Priests prefer the working ship; antiquarians prefer the reconstruction [Wiggins]
We conceptualise objects, but they impinge on us [Wiggins]
A is necessarily A, so if B is A, then B is also necessarily A [Wiggins]
It is hard or impossible to think of Caesar as not human [Wiggins]
Realist Conceptualists accept that our interests affect our concepts [Wiggins]
Conceptualism says we must use our individuating concepts to grasp reality [Wiggins]
Our sortal concepts fix what we find in experience [Wiggins]
Animal classifications: the Emperor's, fabulous, innumerable, like flies, stray dogs, embalmed…. [Wiggins]
Matter underlies things, composes things, and brings them to be [Wiggins]
We refer to persisting substances, in perception and in thought, and they aid understanding [Wiggins]
An ancestral relation is either direct or transitively indirect [Wiggins]
Sortal predications are answers to the question 'what is x?' [Wiggins]
A river may change constantly, but not in respect of being a river [Wiggins]
Sortal classification becomes science, with cross reference clarifying individuals [Wiggins]
The category of substance is more important for epistemology than for ontology [Wiggins]
Seeing a group of soldiers as an army is irresistible, in ontology and explanation [Wiggins]
Naming the secondary substance provides a mass of general information [Wiggins]
Substances contain a source of change or principle of activity [Wiggins]
We never single out just 'this', but always 'this something-or-other' [Wiggins]
If the kinds are divided realistically, they fall into substances [Wiggins]
'Human being' is a better answer to 'what is it?' than 'poet', as the latter comes in degrees [Wiggins]
Secondary substances correctly divide primary substances by activity-principles and relations [Wiggins]