more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 17511

[filed under theme 9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 5. Individuation / e. Individuation by kind ]

Full Idea

The recognition of the fact of continuity is logically independent of the possession of sortal concepts, whereas the formation of sortal concepts is at least psychologically dependent upon the recognition of continuity.

Gist of Idea

Recognising continuity is separate from sortals, and must precede their use

Source

M.R. Ayers (Individuals without Sortals [1974], Intro)

Book Ref

-: 'Canadian Journal of Philosophy' [-], p.117


A Reaction

I take this to be entirely correct. I might add that unity must also be recognised.


The 15 ideas from 'Individuals without Sortals'

Recognising continuity is separate from sortals, and must precede their use [Ayers]
Speakers need the very general category of a thing, if they are to think about it [Ayers]
Some say a 'covering concept' completes identity; others place the concept in the reference [Ayers]
Sortals basically apply to individuals [Ayers]
You can't have the concept of a 'stage' if you lack the concept of an object [Ayers]
We use sortals to classify physical objects by the nature and origin of their unity [Ayers]
Events do not have natural boundaries, and we have to set them [Ayers]
To express borderline cases of objects, you need the concept of an 'object' [Ayers]
Counting 'coin in this box' may have coin as the unit, with 'in this box' merely as the scope [Ayers]
Temporal 'parts' cannot be separated or rearranged [Ayers]
If diachronic identities need covering concepts, why not synchronic identities too? [Ayers]
If there are two objects, then 'that marble, man-shaped object' is ambiguous [Ayers]
Seeing caterpillar and moth as the same needs continuity, not identity of sortal concepts [Ayers]
Could the same matter have more than one form or principle of unity? [Ayers]
If counting needs a sortal, what of things which fall under two sortals? [Ayers]