more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 14919

[filed under theme 10. Modality / A. Necessity / 11. Denial of Necessity ]

Full Idea

To be an empiricist is to withhold belief in anything that goes beyond the actual, observable phenomena, and to recognise no objective modality in nature.

Gist of Idea

Empiricists deny what is unobservable, and reject objective modality

Source

Bas C. van Fraassen (The Scientific Image [1980], p.202), quoted by J Ladyman / D Ross - Every Thing Must Go 2.3.1

Book Ref

Ladyman,J/Ross,D: 'Every Thing Must Go' [OUP 2007], p.99


A Reaction

To only believe in what is actually observable strikes me as ridiculous. It might be, though, that we observe modality, in observing dispositions. If you pull back a bowstring, you feel the possibilities.


The 11 ideas from Bas C. van Fraassen

Is it likely that a successful, coherent, explanatory ontological hypothesis is true? [Fraassen]
Philosophy is a value- and attitude-driven enterprise [Fraassen]
We may end up with a huge theory of carefully constructed falsehoods [Fraassen]
Inference to best explanation contains all sorts of hidden values [Fraassen]
We accept many scientific theories without endorsing them as true [Fraassen]
Analytic philosophy has an exceptional arsenal of critical tools [Fraassen]
An explanation is just descriptive information answering a particular question [Fraassen, by Salmon]
To 'accept' a theory is not to believe it, but to believe it empirically adequate [Fraassen, by Bird]
Why should the true explanation be one of the few we have actually thought of? [Fraassen, by Bird]
To accept a scientific theory, we only need to believe that it is empirically adequate [Fraassen]
Empiricists deny what is unobservable, and reject objective modality [Fraassen]