more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 13052

[filed under theme 14. Science / D. Explanation / 2. Types of Explanation / g. Causal explanations ]

Full Idea

Hempel explicitly rejects the idea that causality plays any essential explanatory role.

Gist of Idea

Hempel rejects causation as part of explanation

Source

report of Carl Hempel (Aspects of Scientific Explanation [1965], p.352) by Wesley Salmon - Four Decades of Scientific Explanation 1.1

Book Ref

Salmon,Wesley C.: 'Four Decades of Scientific Explanation', ed/tr. Humphreys,Paul [Pittsburgh 2006], p.24


A Reaction

Hempel champions the 'covering-law' model of explanation. It strikes me that Hempel is so utterly wrong about this that his views aren't even a candidate for correctness, but then for a long time his views were orthodoxy.


The 32 ideas with the same theme [explanation as showing the causes of events]:

Democritus was devoted to discovering causal explanations [Democritus, by Eusebius]
To investigate the causes of things, study what is best for them [Plato]
To grasp something, trace it back to its natural origins [Aristotle]
The foundation or source is stronger than the thing it causes [Aristotle]
Geometrical proofs do not show causes, as when we prove a triangle contains two right angles [Proclus]
Science aims to show causes and generation of things [Hobbes]
We should admit only enough causes to explain a phenomenon, and no more [Newton]
Natural effects of the same kind should be assumed to have the same causes [Newton]
Minds are best explained by their ends, and bodies by efficient causes [Leibniz]
Causal inference is by spotting either Agreements or Differences [Mill, by Lipton]
If scientific explanation is causal, that rules out mathematical explanation [Smart]
Hempel rejects causation as part of explanation [Hempel, by Salmon]
Flagpoles explain shadows, and not vice versa, because of temporal ordering [Salmon]
Lewis endorses the thesis that all explanation of singular events is causal explanation [Lewis, by Psillos]
To explain an event is to provide some information about its causal history [Lewis]
An explanation tells us how an event was caused [Lewis]
Often explanaton seeks fundamental laws, rather than causal histories [Lewis]
The causal theory of explanation neglects determinations which are not causal [Ruben]
To explain is to give either the causal history, or the causal mechanism [Lipton]
Mathematical and philosophical explanations are not causal [Lipton]
A cause may not be an explanation [Lipton]
Explanations may be easier to find than causes [Lipton]
Causal inferences are clearest when we can manipulate things [Lipton]
Not all explanations are causal, but if a thing can be explained at all, it can be explained causally [Sanford]
There are non-causal explanations, most typically mathematical explanations [Psillos]
An explanation can just be a 'causal story', without laws, as when I knock over some ink [Psillos]
An explanation is a causal graph [Woodward,J, by Strevens]
Natural explanations give the causal interconnections [Haslanger]
Not all explanation is causal. We don't explain a painting's beauty, or the irrationality of root-2, that way [Stout,R]
Explanation of causal phenomena concerns essential kinds - but also lack of them [Chakravartty]
Greek uses the same word for 'cause' and 'explanation' [Koslicki]
There are plenty of examples of non-causal explanation [Audi,P]