more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 15521

[filed under theme 9. Objects / C. Structure of Objects / 8. Parts of Objects / b. Sums of parts ]

Full Idea

Given a prior commitment to cats, a commitment to cat-fusions is not a further commitment. The fusion is nothing over and above the cats that compose it. It just is them. They just are it. Together or separately, the cats are the same portion of Reality.

Gist of Idea

Given cats, a fusion of cats adds nothing further to reality

Source

David Lewis (Parts of Classes [1991], 3.6)

Book Ref

Lewis,David: 'Parts of Classes' [Blackwell 1991], p.81


A Reaction

The two extremes of ontology are that there are no objects, or that every combination is an object. Until reading this I thought Lewis was in the second camp, but this sounds like object-nihilism, as in Van Inwagen and Merricks.

Related Ideas

Idea 15522 The one has different truths from the many; it is one rather than many, one rather than six [Lewis]

Idea 17861 Two men do not make one thing, as well as themselves [Aristotle]


The 22 ideas with the same theme [the concept of parts treated as one concept]:

A 'whole' (rather than a mere 'sum') requires an internal order which distinguishes it [Aristotle]
If a syllable is more than its elements, is the extra bit also an element? [Aristotle]
A body is always the same, whether the parts are together or dispersed [Hobbes]
The place of a thing is the sum of the places of its parts [Newton]
If x is ever part of y, then y is necessarily such that x is part of y at any time that y exists [Chisholm, by Simons]
In mereology no two things consist of the same atoms [Lewis]
Trout-turkeys exist, despite lacking cohesion, natural joints and united causal power [Lewis]
Given cats, a fusion of cats adds nothing further to reality [Lewis]
The one has different truths from the many; it is one rather than many, one rather than six [Lewis]
A gerrymandered mereological sum can be a mess, but still have natural joints [Lewis]
An 'aggregative' sum is spread in time, and exists whenever a component exists [Fine,K]
An 'compound' sum is not spread in time, and only exists when all the components exists [Fine,K]
What exactly is a 'sum', and what exactly is 'composition'? [Harte,V]
If something is 'more than' the sum of its parts, is the extra thing another part, or not? [Harte,V]
The problem with the term 'sum' is that it is singular [Harte,V]
Classical mereology says there are 'sums', for whose existence there is no other evidence [Simons]
'Mereological extensionality' says objects with the same parts are identical [Simons]
If there are c atoms, this gives 2^c - 1 individuals, so there can't be just 2 or 12 individuals [Simons]
Sums are more plausible for pluralities and masses than they are for individuals [Simons]
Sums of things in different categories are found within philosophy. [Simons]
Collections have fixed members, but fusions can be carved in innumerable ways [Potter]
Absolutely unrestricted qualitative composition would allow things with incompatible properties [Paul,LA]