more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 12883

[filed under theme 7. Existence / B. Change in Existence / 3. Moments ]

Full Idea

Moving disturbances are a special and interesting kind of continuant: moments which continuously change their fundaments.

Gist of Idea

Moving disturbances are are moments which continuously change their basis

Source

Peter Simons (Parts [1987], 8.5)

Book Ref

Simons,Peter: 'Parts: a Study in Ontology' [OUP 1987], p.308


A Reaction

[a smile is a moment, and the face its fundament] I'm thinking he's got this wrong. Compare Idea 12882. Disturbances can't be continuants, because the passing of time is essential to them, but not to a continuant.

Related Idea

Idea 12882 A wave is maintained by a process, but it isn't a process [Simons]


The 76 ideas from Peter Simons

Einstein's relativity brought events into ontology, as the terms of a simultaneity relationships [Simons]
Slow and continuous events (like balding or tree-growth) are called 'processes', not 'events' [Simons]
Maybe processes behave like stuff-nouns, and events like count-nouns [Simons]
Any equivalence relation among similar things allows the creation of an abstractum [Simons]
Abstraction is usually seen as producing universals and numbers, but it can do more [Simons]
Internal relations combine some tropes into a nucleus, which bears the non-essential tropes [Simons, by Edwards]
Without extensional mereology two objects can occupy the same position [Simons]
Classical mereology says there are 'sums', for whose existence there is no other evidence [Simons]
'Mereological extensionality' says objects with the same parts are identical [Simons]
A 'part' has different meanings for individuals, classes, and masses [Simons]
Classical mereology doesn't apply well to the objects around us [Simons]
Two standard formalisations of part-whole theory are the Calculus of Individuals, and Mereology [Simons]
Classical mereology doesn't handle temporal or modal notions very well [Simons]
Proper or improper part: x < y, 'x is (a) part of y' [Simons]
Overlap: two parts overlap iff they have a part in common, expressed as 'x o y' [Simons]
Disjoint: two individuals are disjoint iff they do not overlap, written 'x | y' [Simons]
Product: the product of two individuals is the sum of all of their overlaps, written 'x · y' [Simons]
Sum: the sum of individuals is what is overlapped if either of them are, written 'x + y' [Simons]
Difference: the difference of individuals is the remainder of an overlap, written 'x - y' [Simons]
General sum: the sum of objects satisfying some predicate, written σx(Fx) [Simons]
General product: the nucleus of all objects satisfying a predicate, written πx(Fx) [Simons]
Universe: the mereological sum of all objects whatever, written 'U' [Simons]
The part-relation is transitive and asymmetric (and thus irreflexive) [Simons]
Complement: the rest of the Universe apart from some individual, written x-bar [Simons]
Atom: an individual with no proper parts, written 'At x' [Simons]
If there are c atoms, this gives 2^c - 1 individuals, so there can't be just 2 or 12 individuals [Simons]
Criticisms of mereology: parts? transitivity? sums? identity? four-dimensional? [Simons]
Does Tibbles remain the same cat when it loses its tail? [Simons]
Four dimensional-objects are stranger than most people think [Simons]
Relativity has an ontology of things and events, not on space-time diagrams [Simons]
Four-dimensional ontology has no change, since that needs an object, and time to pass [Simons]
Fans of process ontology cheat, since river-stages refer to 'rivers' [Simons]
There are real relational changes, as well as bogus 'Cambridge changes' [Simons]
I do not think there is a general identity condition for events [Simons]
I don't believe in processes [Simons]
Dissective: stuff is dissective if parts of the stuff are always the stuff [Simons]
With activities if you are doing it you've done it, with performances you must finish to have done it [Simons]
Some natural languages don't distinguish between singular and plural [Simons]
A 'group' is a collection with a condition which constitutes their being united [Simons]
Each wheel is part of a car, but the four wheels are not a further part [Simons]
Mass nouns admit 'much' and 'a little', and resist 'many' and 'few'. [Simons]
The same members may form two groups [Simons]
To individuate something we must pick it out, but also know its limits of variation [Simons]
Sums are more plausible for pluralities and masses than they are for individuals [Simons]
An entrepreneur and a museum curator would each be happy with their ship at the end [Simons]
The 'best candidate' theories mistakenly assume there is one answer to 'Which is the real ship?' [Simons]
Intermittent objects would be respectable if they occurred in nature, as well as in artefacts [Simons]
Tibbles isn't Tib-plus-tail, because Tibbles can survive its loss, but the sum can't [Simons]
Mixtures disappear if nearly all of the mixture is one ingredient [Simons]
A mixture can have different qualities from its ingredients. [Simons]
Sortal nouns for continuants tell you their continuance- and cessation-conditions [Simons]
Gold is not its atoms, because the atoms must be all gold, but gold contains neutrons [Simons]
Mass terms (unlike plurals) are used with indifference to whether they can exist in units [Simons]
'The wolves' are the matter of 'the pack'; the latter is a group, with different identity conditions [Simons]
Analytic philosophers may prefer formal systems because natural language is such mess [Simons]
We say 'b is part of a', 'b is a part of a', 'b are a part of a', or 'b are parts of a'. [Simons]
Composition is asymmetric and transitive [Simons]
A hand constitutes a fist (when clenched), but a fist is not composed of an augmented hand [Simons]
Objects have their essential properties because of the kind of objects they are [Simons]
We must distinguish the de dicto 'must' of propositions from the de re 'must' of essence [Simons]
The zygote is an essential initial part, for a sexually reproduced organism [Simons]
Original parts are the best candidates for being essential to artefacts [Simons]
An essential part of an essential part is an essential part of the whole [Simons]
One false note doesn't make it a performance of a different work [Simons]
Sums of things in different categories are found within philosophy. [Simons]
Philosophy is stuck on the Fregean view that an individual is anything with a proper name [Simons]
Moments are things like smiles or skids, which are founded on other things [Simons]
Independent objects can exist apart, and maybe even entirely alone [Simons]
Moving disturbances are are moments which continuously change their basis [Simons]
A wave is maintained by a process, but it isn't a process [Simons]
A smiling is an event with causes, but the smile is a continuant without causes [Simons]
A whole requires some unique relation which binds together all of the parts [Simons]
Objects like chess games, with gaps in them, are thereby less unified [Simons]
The limits of change for an individual depend on the kind of individual [Simons]
The wholeness of a melody seems conventional, but of an explosion it seems natural [Simons]
Metaphysics attempts to give an account of everything, in terms of categories and principles [Simons]