more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 13075

[filed under theme 9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 5. Individuation / d. Individuation by haecceity ]

Full Idea

In addition to the difference of time or of place there must always be an internal principle of distinction: although there can be many things of the same kind, it is still the case that none of them are ever exactly alike.

Gist of Idea

No two things are quite the same, so there must be an internal principle of distinction

Source

Gottfried Leibniz (New Essays on Human Understanding [1704], 2.27)

Book Ref

Leibniz,Gottfried: 'New Essays on Human Understanding', ed/tr. Remnant/Bennett [CUP 1996], p.230


A Reaction

This rests on Leibniz's unusual view that all things (even electrons) are qualitatively distinct. Personally I disagree with that, but agree with the idea. Things have time and place because they have identity, not the other way around.


The 21 ideas with the same theme [a special property marking a thing's uniqueness]:

Doesn't each thing have an essence, just as it has other qualities? [Plato]
For Aristotle, things are not made individual by some essential distinguishing mark [Aristotle, by Frede,M]
We can call the quality of Plato 'Platonity', and say it is a quality which only he possesses [Boethius]
The haecceity is the featureless thing which gives ultimate individuality to a substance [Duns Scotus, by Cover/O'Leary-Hawthorne]
Scotus said a substantial principle of individuation [haecceitas] was needed for an essence [Duns Scotus, by Dumont]
No two things are quite the same, so there must be an internal principle of distinction [Leibniz]
The laws-of-the-series plays a haecceitist role [Leibniz, by Cover/O'Leary-Hawthorne]
A haecceity is a property had necessarily, and strictly confined to one entity [Chisholm]
Being the tallest man is an 'individual concept', but not a haecceity [Chisholm]
A snowball's haecceity is the property of being identical with itself [Plantinga, by Westerhoff]
Surely self-identity is essential to Socrates? [Plantinga]
'Being Socrates' and 'being identical with Socrates' characterise Socrates, so they are among his properties [Plantinga]
Adams says actual things have haecceities, but not things that only might exist [Adams,RM, by Stalnaker]
A 'thisness' is a thing's property of being identical with itself (not the possession of self-identity) [Adams,RM]
There are cases where mere qualities would not ensure an intrinsic identity [Adams,RM]
The idea of 'thisness' is better expressed with designation/predication and particular/universal [Wiggins]
Haecceities implausibly have no qualities [Jubien]
Any entity has the unique property of being that specific entity [Jubien]
Haecceity as property, or as colourless thisness, or as singleton set [Cover/O'Leary-Hawthorne]
A haecceity is a set of individual properties, essential to each thing [Read]
A haecceity is the essential, simple, unanalysable property of being-this-thing [Mackie,P]