more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 7869

[filed under theme 19. Language / C. Assigning Meanings / 8. Possible Worlds Semantics ]

Full Idea

Basing content on possible worlds that result in truth leaves no room for thoughts about genuine impossibilities, since there are not possible worlds whose actuality would make an 'impossible thought' true.

Gist of Idea

Truth conditions in possible worlds can't handle statements about impossibilities

Source

David Papineau (Thinking about Consciousness [2002], 3.7)

Book Ref

Papineau,David: 'Thinking about Consciousness' [OUP 2004], p.88


A Reaction

Negative existentials like 'no rabbits in this room' and 'no snakes in this room' seem to have the same truth conditions as well. I suppose the sentences must be translated into a logical form which suits the theory, with negation stuck on the end.


The 54 ideas from David Papineau

Externalism may be the key idea in philosophical naturalism [Papineau]
Epiphenomenalism is supervenience without physicalism [Papineau]
Supervenience requires all mental events to have physical effects [Papineau]
If a mental state is multiply realisable, why does it lead to similar behaviour? [Papineau]
How does a dualist mind represent, exist outside space, and be transparent to itself? [Papineau]
Functionalism needs causation and intentionality to explain actions [Papineau]
Knowing what it is like to be something only involves being (physically) that thing [Papineau]
The Private Language argument only means people may misjudge their experiences [Papineau]
There is a single file per object, memorised, reactivated, consolidated and expanded [Papineau, by Recanati]
All worthwhile philosophy is synthetic theorizing, evaluated by experience [Papineau]
A priori knowledge is analytic - the structure of our concepts - and hence unimportant [Papineau]
Intuition and thought-experiments embody substantial information about the world [Papineau]
Our best theories may commit us to mathematical abstracta, but that doesn't justify the commitment [Papineau]
Verificationism about concepts means you can't deny a theory, because you can't have the concept [Papineau]
Belief truth-conditions are normal circumstances where the belief is supposed to occur [Papineau]
Maybe a creature is conscious if its mental states represent things in a distinct way [Papineau]
Most reductive accounts of representation imply broad content [Papineau]
Thinking about a thing doesn't require activating it [Papineau]
Consciousness affects bodily movement, so thoughts must be material states [Papineau]
The only serious mind-brain theories now are identity, token identity, realization and supervenience [Papineau]
Causation is based on either events, or facts, or states of affairs [Papineau]
Whether octopuses feel pain is unclear, because our phenomenal concepts are too vague [Papineau]
It is absurd to think that physical effects are caused twice, so conscious causes must be physical [Papineau]
If causes are basic particulars, this doesn't make conscious and physical properties identical [Papineau]
Causes are instantiations of properties by particulars, or they are themselves basic particulars [Papineau]
If content hinges on matters outside of you, how can it causally influence your actions? [Papineau]
The epiphenomenal relation of mind and brain is a 'causal dangler', unlike anything else [Papineau]
Maybe minds do not cause actions, but do cause us to report our decisions [Papineau]
Maybe mind and body do overdetermine acts, but are linked (for some reason) [Papineau]
Supervenience can be replaced by identifying mind with higher-order or disjunctional properties [Papineau]
Mary acquires new concepts; she previously thought about the same property using material concepts [Papineau]
Truth conditions in possible worlds can't handle statements about impossibilities [Papineau]
Thought content is possible worlds that make the thought true; if that includes the actual world, it's true [Papineau]
Role concepts either name the realising property, or the higher property constituting the role [Papineau]
Perceptual concepts can't just refer to what causes classification [Papineau]
Teleosemantics equates meaning with the item the concept is intended to track [Papineau]
Young children can see that other individuals sometimes have false beliefs [Papineau]
Do we understand other minds by simulation-theory, or by theory-theory? [Papineau]
Mind-brain reduction is less explanatory, because phenomenal concepts lack causal roles [Papineau]
Accept ontological monism, but conceptual dualism; we think in a different way about phenomenal thought [Papineau]
Researching phenomenal consciousness is peculiar, because the concepts involved are peculiar [Papineau]
Verificationists tend to infer indefinite answers from undecidable questions [Papineau]
The 'actualist' HOT theory says consciousness comes from actual higher judgements of mental states [Papineau]
Actualist HOT theories imply that a non-conscious mental event could become conscious when remembered [Papineau]
States are conscious if they could be the subject of higher-order mental judgements [Papineau]
Higher-order judgements may be possible where the subject denies having been conscious [Papineau]
Our concept of consciousness is crude, and lacks theoretical articulation [Papineau]
We can’t decide what 'conscious' means, so it is undecidable whether cats are conscious [Papineau]
Modern biological research, especially into the cell, has revealed no special new natural forces [Papineau]
Quantum 'wave collapses' seem to violate conservation of energy [Papineau]
Determinism is possible without a complete physics, if mental forces play a role [Papineau]
Weak reduction of mind is to physical causes; strong reduction is also to physical laws [Papineau]
The completeness of physics is needed for mind-brain identity [Papineau]
The completeness of physics cannot be proved [Papineau]