more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 15789

[filed under theme 7. Existence / A. Nature of Existence / 2. Types of Existence ]

Full Idea

I suggest that Lewis's view in fact is just Meinong's view. ...Meinong distinguishes between 'existing' and merely 'subsisting', Lewis between 'being actual' and merely 'existing'.

Gist of Idea

Lewis's distinction of 'existing' from 'being actual' is Meinong's between 'existing' and 'subsisting'

Source

comment on David Lewis (Possible Worlds [1973]) by William Lycan - The Trouble with Possible Worlds 06

Book Ref

'The Possible and the Actual', ed/tr. Loux,Michael J. [Cornell 1979], p.288


A Reaction

Lewis attempts to make actuality purely 'indexical' in character, like distinguishing the world 'here' from the world 'elsewhere', but Lycan seems right that he is committed to more than that.


The 3 ideas from 'Possible Worlds'

Lewis's distinction of 'existing' from 'being actual' is Meinong's between 'existing' and 'subsisting' [Lycan on Lewis]
Lewis can't know possible worlds without first knowing what is possible or impossible [Lycan on Lewis]
What are the ontological grounds for grouping possibilia into worlds? [Lycan on Lewis]