more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 13737

[filed under theme 1. Philosophy / E. Nature of Metaphysics / 7. Against Metaphysics ]

Full Idea

The empiricist does not say to the metaphysician 'what you say is false', but 'what you say asserts nothing at all!' He does not contradict him, but says 'I don't understand you'.

Gist of Idea

The empiricist says that metaphysics is meaningless, rather than false

Source

Moritz Schlick (Positivism and Realism [1934], p.107), quoted by Jonathan Schaffer - On What Grounds What 1.1

Book Ref

'Metametaphysics', ed/tr. Chalmers/Manley/Wasserman [OUP 2009], p.349


A Reaction

I take metaphysics to be meaningful, but at such a high level of abstraction that it is easy to drift into vague nonsense, and incredibly hard to assess what is meant, and whether it is correct. The truths of metaphysics are not recursive.


The 14 ideas with the same theme [rejections of metaphysics as a worthwhile activity]:

Kant exposed the illusions of reason in the Transcendental Dialectic [Kant, by Fraassen]
On the continent it is generally believed that metaphysics died with Hegel [Benardete,JA on Hegel]
The demonstrations of the metaphysicians are all moonshine [Peirce]
Kant has undermined our belief in metaphysics [Nietzsche]
Metaphysics is finding bad reasons for instinctive beliefs [Bradley]
The empiricist says that metaphysics is meaningless, rather than false [Schlick]
Metaphysics uses empty words, or just produces pseudo-statements [Carnap]
Humeans rejected the a priori synthetic, and so rejected even Kantian metaphysics [Ayer, by Macdonald,C]
Philosophy has been relieved of physics, cosmology, politics, and now must give up ontology [Badiou]
'Quietist' says abandon metaphysics because answers are unattainable (as in Kant's noumenon) [Fine,K]
After 1903, Husserl avoids metaphysical commitments [Mares]
Wide metaphysical possibility may reduce metaphysics to analysis of fantasies [Maudlin]
Science has discovered properties of things, so there are properties - so who needs metaphysics? [Hofweber]
'Fundamentality' is either a superficial idea, or much too obscure [Hofweber]