more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 6271

[filed under theme 19. Language / B. Reference / 1. Reference theories ]

Full Idea

A theory of how reference is specified isn't a theory of what reference is.

Gist of Idea

How reference is specified is not what reference is

Source

Hilary Putnam (Meaning and the Moral Sciences [1978], Lec V)

Book Ref

Putnam,Hilary: 'Meaning and the Moral Sciences' [RKP 1981], p.58


A Reaction

A simple and important point. We may achieve reference by naming, describing, grunting or pointing, but the question is, what have we achieved when we get there?


The 22 ideas from 'Meaning and the Moral Sciences'

A culture needs to admit that knowledge is more extensive than just 'science' [Putnam]
We need the correspondence theory of truth to understand language and science [Putnam]
In Tarski's definition, you understand 'true' if you accept the notions of the object language [Putnam]
Tarski has given a correct account of the formal logic of 'true', but there is more to the concept [Putnam]
The claim that scientific terms are incommensurable can be blocked if scientific terms are not descriptions [Putnam]
Only Tarski has found a way to define 'true' [Putnam]
The correct translation is the one that explains the speaker's behaviour [Putnam]
How reference is specified is not what reference is [Putnam]
Knowledge depends on believing others, which must be innate, as inferences are not strong enough [Putnam]
Empathy may not give knowledge, but it can give plausibility or right opinion [Putnam]
'True' and 'refers' cannot be made scientically precise, but are fundamental to science [Putnam]
You can't decide which explanations are good if you don't attend to the interest-relative aspects [Putnam]
Truth conditions can't explain understanding a sentence, because that in turn needs explanation [Putnam]
If a tautology is immune from revision, why would that make it true? [Putnam]
Realism is a theory, which explains the convergence of science and the success of language [Putnam]
Theory of meaning presupposes theory of understanding and reference [Putnam]
Language maps the world in many ways (because it maps onto other languages in many ways) [Putnam]
You can't say 'most speaker's beliefs are true'; in some areas this is not so, and you can't count beliefs [Putnam]
'The rug is green' might be warrantedly assertible even though the rug is not green [Putnam]
Correspondence between concepts and unconceptualised reality is impossible [Putnam]
A private language could work with reference and beliefs, and wouldn't need meaning [Putnam]
We should reject the view that truth is prior to meaning [Putnam]