more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 12146

[filed under theme 9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 4. Essence as Definition ]

Full Idea

If a definition is the recognition of some essence, it is clear that such items are not essences.

Gist of Idea

Definitions recognise essences, so are not themselves essences

Source

Aristotle (Posterior Analytics [c.327 BCE], 90b17)

Book Ref

Aristotle: 'Posterior Analytics (2nd ed)', ed/tr. Barnes,Jonathan [OUP 1993], p.50


A Reaction

So definitions are not themselves essences (as some modern thinkers claim). The idea seems obvious to me, but it is a warning against a simplistic view of Aristotelian essences, and a reminder that such things are real, not verbal.


The 72 ideas from 'Posterior Analytics'

Aristotelian essences are properties mentioned at the starting point of a science [Aristotle, by Kung]
For Aristotle knowledge is explanatory, involving understanding, and principles or causes [Aristotle, by Witt]
'Episteme' means grasping causes, universal judgments, explanation, and teaching [Aristotle, by Witt]
Aristotle's concepts of understanding and explanation mean he is not a pure empiricist [Aristotle, by Frede,M]
Demonstration is more than entailment, as the explanatory order must match the causal order [Aristotle, by Koslicki]
Aristotle gets asymmetric consequence from demonstration, which reflects real causal priority [Aristotle, by Koslicki]
Aristotle doesn't actually apply his theory of demonstration to his practical science [Leroi on Aristotle]
Explanation and generality are inseparable [Aristotle, by Wedin]
Everything is either asserted or denied truly [Aristotle]
We understand a thing when we know its explanation and its necessity [Aristotle]
We can know by demonstration, which is a scientific deduction leading to understanding [Aristotle]
Premises must be true, primitive and immediate, and prior to and explanatory of conclusions [Aristotle]
We only understand something when we know its explanation [Aristotle]
What is most universal is furthest away, and the particulars are nearest [Aristotle]
Negation takes something away from something [Aristotle]
An axiom is a principle which must be understood if one is to learn anything [Aristotle]
A unit is what is quantitatively indivisible [Aristotle]
The foundation or source is stronger than the thing it causes [Aristotle]
When you understand basics, you can't be persuaded to change your mind [Aristotle]
Sceptics say justification is an infinite regress, or it stops at the unknowable [Aristotle]
Maybe everything could be demonstrated, if demonstration can be reciprocal or circular [Aristotle]
Some understanding, of immediate items, is indemonstrable [Aristotle]
A demonstration is a deduction which proceeds from necessities [Aristotle]
The essence of a triangle comes from the line, mentioned in any account of triangles [Aristotle]
Something holds universally when it is proved of an arbitrary and primitive case [Aristotle]
Demonstrative understanding rests on necessary features of the thing in itself [Aristotle]
Demonstrations must be necessary, and that depends on the middle term [Aristotle]
Whatever holds of a kind intrinsically holds of it necessarily [Aristotle]
Knowledge proceeds from principles, so it is hard to know if we know [Aristotle]
All demonstration is concerned with existence, axioms and properties [Aristotle]
Aristotle's axioms (unlike Euclid's) are assumptions awaiting proof [Aristotle, by Leibniz]
Separate Forms aren't needed for logic, but universals (one holding of many) are essential [Aristotle]
Demonstrations by reductio assume excluded middle [Aristotle]
Mathematics is concerned with forms, not with superficial properties [Aristotle]
The reason why is the key to knowledge [Aristotle]
Some knowledge is lost if you lose a sense, and there is no way the knowledge can be replaced [Aristotle]
We can forget the Forms, as they are irrelevant, and not needed in giving demonstrations [Aristotle]
Demonstrations are syllogisms which give explanations [Aristotle]
Universals give better explanations, because they are self-explanatory and primitive [Aristotle]
Universal demonstrations are about thought; particular demonstrations lead to perceptions [Aristotle]
Demonstration is better with fewer presuppositions, and it is quicker if these are familiar [Aristotle]
Units are positionless substances, and points are substances with position [Aristotle]
You cannot understand anything through perception [Aristotle]
We learn universals from many particulars [Aristotle]
Universals are valuable because they make the explanations plain [Aristotle]
Two falsehoods can be contrary to one another [Aristotle]
What is necessary cannot be otherwise [Aristotle]
No one has mere belief about something if they think it HAS to be true [Aristotle]
What we seek and understand are facts, reasons, existence, and identity [Aristotle]
What it is and why it is are the same; screening defines and explains an eclipse [Aristotle]
Definitions are of what something is, and that is universal [Aristotle]
Definitions recognise essences, so are not themselves essences [Aristotle]
The principles of demonstrations are definitions [Aristotle]
There must be definitions before demonstration is possible [Aristotle]
Why are being terrestrial and a biped combined in the definition of man, but being literate and musical aren't? [Aristotle]
Properties must be proved, but not essence; but existents are not a kind, so existence isn't part of essence [Aristotle]
Explanation is of the status of a thing, inferences to it, initiation of change, and purpose [Aristotle]
A stone travels upwards by a forced necessity, and downwards by natural necessity [Aristotle]
The predicates of a thing's nature are necessary to it [Aristotle]
Aim to get definitions of the primitive components, thus establishing the kind, and work towards the attributes [Aristotle]
Definition by division needs predicates, which are well ordered and thorough [Aristotle]
You can define objects by progressively identifying what is the same and what is different [Aristotle]
If you shouldn't argue in metaphors, then you shouldn't try to define them either [Aristotle]
Are particulars explained more by universals, or by other particulars? [Aristotle]
Animals may have some knowledge if they retain perception, but understanding requires reasons to be given [Aristotle]
Many memories of the same item form a single experience [Aristotle]
Perception creates primitive immediate principles by building a series of firm concepts [Aristotle]
A perception lodging in the soul creates a primitive universal, which becomes generalised [Aristotle]
We learn primitives and universals by induction from perceptions [Aristotle]
To seek truth, study the real connections between subjects and attributes [Aristotle]
There is pure deductive reasoning, and explanatory demonstration reasoning [Aristotle, by Politis]
An Aristotelian definition is causal [Aristotle, by Witt]