more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 17067

[filed under theme 14. Science / D. Explanation / 2. Types of Explanation / c. Explanations by coherence ]

Full Idea

4: Observation reports (for coherence) have a degree of acceptability on their own.

Gist of Idea

4: For coherence, observation reports have a degree of intrinsic acceptability

Source

report of Paul Thagard (Explanatory Coherence [1989], 4) by J.J.C. Smart - Explanation - Opening Address p.04

Book Ref

'Explanation and Its Limits', ed/tr. Knowles,Dudley [CUP 1990], p.4


A Reaction

Thagard makes this an axiom, but Smart rejects that and says there is no reason why observation reports should not also be accepted because of their coherence (with our views about our senses etc.). I agree with Smart.


The 14 ideas with the same theme [explanation by showing how it fits into other beliefs]:

Explanation of a fact is fitting it into a system of beliefs [Smart]
Explanations are bad by fitting badly with a web of beliefs, or fitting well into a bad web [Smart]
Deducing from laws is one possible way to achieve a coherent explanation [Smart]
Good explanations unify [Ellis]
An explanation is a model that fits a theory and predicts the phenomenological laws [Cartwright,N]
An explanation unifies a phenomenon with our account of other phenomena [Lipton]
We can go beyond mere causal explanations if we believe in an 'order of being' [Cover/O'Leary-Hawthorne]
1: Coherence is a symmetrical relation between two propositions [Thagard, by Smart]
2: An explanation must wholly cohere internally, and with the new fact [Thagard, by Smart]
3: If an analogous pair explain another analogous pair, then they all cohere [Thagard, by Smart]
4: For coherence, observation reports have a degree of intrinsic acceptability [Thagard, by Smart]
5: Contradictory propositions incohere [Thagard, by Smart]
6: A proposition's acceptability depends on its coherence with a system [Thagard, by Smart]
We explain by deriving the properties of a phenomenon by embedding it in a large abstract theory [Ladyman/Ross]