more on this theme | more from this text
Full Idea
The view of Chomsky in 1957 that category mistakes are syntactically well-formed but meaningless is a very standard one.
Gist of Idea
Chomsky established the view that category mistakes are well-formed but meaningless
Source
report of Noam Chomsky (Syntactic Structure [1957]) by Ofra Magidor - Category Mistakes 1.3
Book Ref
Magidor,Ofra: 'Category Mistakes' [OUP 2013], p.19
A Reaction
I'm going off the idea that they are meaningless, largely because I am beginning to sympathise with the view that any composition of meaningful components is meaningful (even if blatantly false).
Related Idea
Idea 17999 Strong compositionality says meaningful expressions syntactically well-formed are meaningful [Magidor]
| 18006 | Chomsky's 'interpretative semantics' says syntax comes first, and is then interpreted [Chomsky, by Magidor] |
| 6649 | Chomsky now says concepts are basically innate, as well as syntax [Chomsky, by Lowe] |
| 18007 | Syntax is independent of semantics; sentences can be well formed but meaningless [Chomsky, by Magidor] |
| 18009 | Chomsky established the view that category mistakes are well-formed but meaningless [Chomsky, by Magidor] |