more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 18386

[filed under theme 3. Truth / B. Truthmakers / 7. Making Modal Truths ]

Full Idea

It is possible that there could have been nothing. ...What would be its truthmaker?

Gist of Idea

What is the truthmaker for 'it is possible that there could have been nothing'?

Source

David M. Armstrong (Truth and Truthmakers [2004], 07.4)

Book Ref

Armstrong,D.M.: 'Truth and Truthmakers' [CUP 2004], p.90


A Reaction

I suppose the truthmaker here is the whole of reality, with its dispositions and contingencies. But that won't do for 'possibly there might never have been anything'. In such a case there wouldn't be any truths.


The 31 ideas from 'Truth and Truthmakers'

Truth-making can't be entailment, because truthmakers are portions of reality [Armstrong]
Armstrong says truthmakers necessitate their truth, where 'necessitate' is a primitive relation [Armstrong, by MacBride]
For all being, there is a potential proposition which expresses its existence and nature [Armstrong]
A realm of abstract propositions is causally inert, so has no explanatory value [Armstrong]
We need properties, as minimal truthmakers for the truths about objects [Armstrong]
The class of similar things is much too big a truthmaker for the feature of a particular [Armstrong]
If tropes are non-transferable, then they necessarily belong to their particular substance [Armstrong]
Truthmaking needs states of affairs, to unite particulars with tropes or universals. [Armstrong]
General truths are a type of negative truth, saying there are no more ravens than black ones [Armstrong]
Negative truths have as truthmakers all states of affairs relevant to the truth [Armstrong]
Length is a 'determinable' property, and one mile is one its 'determinates' [Armstrong]
The determinates of a determinable must be incompatible with each other [Armstrong]
Negative causations supervene on positive causations plus their laws? [Armstrong]
Necessitating general truthmakers must also specify their limits [Armstrong]
The nature of arctic animals is truthmaker for the absence of penguins there [Armstrong]
One truthmaker will do for a contingent truth and for its contradictory [Armstrong]
Logical atomism builds on the simple properties, but are they the only possible properties? [Armstrong]
What is the truthmaker for 'it is possible that there could have been nothing'? [Armstrong]
The truthmakers for possible unicorns are the elements in their combination [Armstrong]
Possible worlds don't fix necessities; intrinsic necessities imply the extension in worlds [Armstrong]
When entities contain entities, or overlap with them, there is 'partial' identity [Armstrong]
All metaphysical discussion should be guided by a quest for truthmakers [Armstrong]
'Naturalism' says only the world of space-time exists [Armstrong]
For 'there is a class with no members' we don't need the null set as truthmaker [Armstrong]
Classes have cardinalities, so their members must all be treated as units [Armstrong]
In mathematics, truthmakers are possible instantiations of structures [Armstrong]
The set theory brackets { } assert that the member is a unit [Armstrong]
Properties are not powers - they just have powers [Armstrong]
Powers must result in some non-powers, or there would only be potential without result [Armstrong]
How does the power of gravity know the distance it acts over? [Armstrong]
The pure present moment is too brief to be experienced [Armstrong]