more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 18869

[filed under theme 3. Truth / B. Truthmakers / 6. Making Negative Truths ]

Full Idea

If negative truths don't have truthmakers then make no mistake: they are ungrounded.

Gist of Idea

Without truthmakers, negative truths must be ungrounded

Source

Ross P. Cameron (Truthmakers, Realism and Ontology [2008], 'Max and Nec')

Book Ref

'Being: Developments in Contemporary Metaphysics', ed/tr. Le Poidevin,R [CUP 2008], p.107


A Reaction

What would be the grounding for truths which expressed the necessary preconditions for all existence? Could 'nothing whatever exists' ever be a truth?


The 14 ideas from 'Truthmakers, Realism and Ontology'

What the proposition says may not be its truthmaker [Cameron]
Rather than what exists, some claim that the truthmakers are ways of existence, dispositions, modalities etc [Cameron]
For realists it is analytic that truths are grounded in the world [Cameron]
Without truthmakers, negative truths must be ungrounded [Cameron]
Maybe truthmaking and correspondence stand together, and are interdefinable [Cameron]
I support the correspondence theory because I believe in truthmakers [Cameron]
Orthodox Truthmaker applies to all propositions, and necessitates their truth [Cameron]
God fixes all the truths of the world by fixing what exists [Cameron]
Surely if some propositions are grounded in existence, they all are? [Cameron]
We should reject distinct but indiscernible worlds [Cameron]
Moral realism doesn't seem to entail the existence of any things [Cameron]
Truthmaking doesn't require realism, because we can be anti-realist about truthmakers [Cameron]
Realism says a discourse is true or false, and some of it is true [Cameron]
Realism says truths rest on mind-independent reality; truthmaking theories are about which features [Cameron]