more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 16339

[filed under theme 3. Truth / A. Truth Problems / 1. Truth ]

Full Idea

Two typed disquotation sentences, truth axioms of TB, suffice for proving that there at least two objects. Hence truth is not a logical notion if one expects logical notions to be ontologically neutral.

Gist of Idea

Truth axioms prove objects exist, so truth doesn't seem to be a logical notion

Source

Volker Halbach (Axiomatic Theories of Truth [2011], 21.2)

Book Ref

Halbach,Volker: 'Axiomatic Theories of Truth' [CUP 2011], p.314

Related Idea

Idea 16315 The Tarski Biconditional theory TB is Peano Arithmetic, plus truth, plus all Tarski bi-conditionals [Halbach]


The 47 ideas from 'Axiomatic Theories of Truth'

An explicit definition enables the elimination of what is defined [Halbach]
Traditional definitions of truth often make it more obscure, rather than less [Halbach]
Semantic theories avoid Tarski's Theorem by sticking to a sublanguage [Halbach]
Axiomatic truth doesn't presuppose a truth-definition, though it could admit it at a later stage [Halbach]
Any definition of truth requires a metalanguage [Halbach]
Analysis rests on natural language, but its ideal is a framework which revises language [Halbach]
The main semantic theories of truth are Kripke's theory, and revisions semantics [Halbach]
Friedman-Sheard is type-free Compositional Truth, with two inference rules for truth [Halbach]
Kripke-Feferman theory KF axiomatises Kripke fixed-points, with Strong Kleene logic with gluts [Halbach]
Truth-value 'gluts' allow two truth values together; 'gaps' give a partial conception of truth [Halbach]
The KF is much stronger deductively than FS, which relies on classical truth [Halbach]
The KF theory is useful, but it is not a theory containing its own truth predicate [Halbach]
The underestimated costs of giving up classical logic are found in mathematical reasoning [Halbach]
In Strong Kleene logic a disjunction just needs one disjunct to be true [Halbach]
In Weak Kleene logic there are 'gaps', neither true nor false if one component lacks a truth value [Halbach]
The liar paradox applies truth to a negated truth (but the conditional will serve equally) [Halbach]
Disquotational truth theories are short of deductive power [Halbach]
Gödel numbering means a theory of truth can use Peano Arithmetic as its base theory [Halbach]
We need propositions to ascribe the same beliefs to people with different languages [Halbach]
Deflationism says truth is a disquotation device to express generalisations, adding no new knowledge [Halbach]
Truth axioms need a base theory, because that is where truth issues arise [Halbach]
Truth axioms prove objects exist, so truth doesn't seem to be a logical notion [Halbach]
Normally we only endorse a theory if we believe it to be sound [Halbach]
Soundness must involve truth; the soundness of PA certainly needs it [Halbach]
You cannot just say all of Peano arithmetic is true, as 'true' isn't part of the system [Halbach]
The global reflection principle seems to express the soundness of Peano Arithmetic [Halbach]
That Peano arithmetic is interpretable in ZF set theory is taken by philosophers as a reduction [Halbach]
Maybe necessity is a predicate, not the usual operator, to make it more like truth [Halbach]
Many new paradoxes may await us when we study interactions between frameworks [Halbach]
We know a complete axiomatisation of truth is not feasible [Halbach]
If people have big doubts about truth, a definition might give it more credibility [Halbach]
Don't trust analogies; they are no more than a guideline [Halbach]
Set theory was liberated early from types, and recent truth-theories are exploring type-free [Halbach]
Every attempt at formal rigour uses some set theory [Halbach]
A theory is some formulae and all of their consequences [Halbach]
To axiomatise Tarski's truth definition, we need a binary predicate for his 'satisfaction' [Halbach]
To reduce PA to ZF, we represent the non-negative integers with von Neumann ordinals [Halbach]
A theory is 'conservative' if it adds no new theorems to its base theory [Halbach, by PG]
The Tarski Biconditional theory TB is Peano Arithmetic, plus truth, plus all Tarski bi-conditionals [Halbach]
The main problem for deflationists is they can express generalisations, but not prove them [Halbach]
Deflationists say truth is just for expressing infinite conjunctions or generalisations [Halbach]
Compositional Truth CT has the truth of a sentence depending of the semantic values of its constituents [Halbach]
Compositional Truth CT proves generalisations, so is preferred in discussions of deflationism [Halbach]
Some say deflationism is axioms which are conservative over the base theory [Halbach]
The compactness theorem can prove nonstandard models of PA [Halbach]
CT proves PA consistent, which PA can't do on its own, so CT is not conservative over PA [Halbach]
Theories of truth are 'typed' (truth can't apply to sentences containing 'true'), or 'type-free' [Halbach]