more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 10797

[filed under theme 9. Objects / F. Identity among Objects / 2. Defining Identity ]

Full Idea

Substitutivity 'salve veritate' cannot define identity since two expressions may be everywhere intersubstitutable and not refer at all.

Clarification

'Salve veritate' means truth-preserving

Gist of Idea

Substitutivity won't fix identity, because expressions may be substitutable, but not refer at all

Source

Ruth Barcan Marcus (Nominalism and Substitutional Quantifiers [1978], p.167)

Book Ref

'Philosophy of Logic: an anthology', ed/tr. Jacquette,Dale [Blackwell 2002], p.167


The 13 ideas from 'Nominalism and Substitutional Quantifiers'

Maybe a substitutional semantics for quantification lends itself to nominalism [Marcus (Barcan)]
Nominalists see proper names as a main vehicle of reference [Marcus (Barcan)]
Anything which refers tends to be called a 'name', even if it isn't a noun [Marcus (Barcan)]
Is being just referent of the verb 'to be'? [Marcus (Barcan)]
Nominalists say predication is relations between individuals, or deny that it refers [Marcus (Barcan)]
Quantifiers are needed to refer to infinitely many objects [Marcus (Barcan)]
Substitutional semantics has no domain of objects, but place-markers for substitutions [Marcus (Barcan)]
The nominalist is tied by standard semantics to first-order, denying higher-order abstracta [Marcus (Barcan)]
Substitutional language has no ontology, and is just a way of speaking [Marcus (Barcan)]
If objects are thoughts, aren't we back to psychologism? [Marcus (Barcan)]
Substitutivity won't fix identity, because expressions may be substitutable, but not refer at all [Marcus (Barcan)]
Nominalists should quantify existentially at first-order, and substitutionally when higher [Marcus (Barcan)]
A true universal sentence might be substitutionally refuted, by an unnamed denumerable object [Marcus (Barcan)]