more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 20506

[filed under theme 24. Political Theory / C. Ruling a State / 3. Government / a. Government ]

Full Idea

The Federalists took the idea of 'separation of powers' from Locke and Montesquieu. This places the legislative, executive and judicial functions in independent hands, so that in theory any branch of government would be checked by the other two.

Gist of Idea

'Separation of powers' allows legislative, executive and judicial functions to monitor one another

Source

Jonathan Wolff (An Introduction to Political Philosophy (Rev) [2006], 3 'Representative')

Book Ref

Wolff,Jonathan: 'An Introduction to Political Philosophy (Rev)' [OUP 2006], p.96


A Reaction

[The American Federalist writers of 1787-8 were Madison, Hamilton and Jay] This is a brilliant idea. An interesting further element that has been added to it is the monitoring by a free press, presumably because the other three were negligent.


The 32 ideas from Jonathan Wolff

A realistic and less utopian anarchism looks increasingly like liberal democracy [Wolff,J]
It is hard for anarchists to deny that we need experts [Wolff,J]
Human beings can never really flourish in a long-term state of nature [Wolff,J]
Collective rationality is individuals doing their best, assuming others all do the same [Wolff,J]
Following some laws is not a moral matter; trivial traffic rules, for example [Wolff,J]
For utilitarians, consent to the state is irrelevant, if it produces more happiness [Wolff,J]
Social contract theory has the attracton of including everyone, and being voluntary [Wolff,J]
Maybe voting in elections is a grant of legitimacy to the winners [Wolff,J]
A system of democracy which includes both freedom and equality is almost impossible [Wolff,J]
Democracy expresses equal respect (which explains why criminals forfeit the vote) [Wolff,J]
Democracy has been seen as consistent with many types of inequality [Wolff,J]
A true democracy could not tolerate slavery, exploitation or colonialism [Wolff,J]
How can dictators advance the interests of the people, if they don't consult them about interests? [Wolff,J]
Political equality is not much use without social equality [Wolff,J]
Occasional defeat is acceptable, but a minority that is continually defeated is a problem [Wolff,J]
'Separation of powers' allows legislative, executive and judicial functions to monitor one another [Wolff,J]
We can see the 'general will' as what is in the general interest [Wolff,J]
We should decide whether voting is for self-interests, or for the common good [Wolff,J]
Condorcet proved that sensible voting leads to an emphatically right answer [Wolff,J]
If natural rights are axiomatic, there is then no way we can defend them [Wolff,J]
Standard rights: life, free speech, assembly, movement, vote, stand (plus shelter, food, health?) [Wolff,J]
If rights are natural, rather than inferred, how do we know which rights we have? [Wolff,J]
Liberty principles can't justify laws against duelling, incest between siblings and euthanasia [Wolff,J]
Utilitarians argue for equal distribution because of diminishing utility of repetition [Wolff,J]
Difference Principle: all inequalities should be in favour of the disadvantaged [Wolff,J]
Utilitarianism probably implies a free market plus welfare [Wolff,J]
Political choice can be by utility, or maximin, or maximax [Wolff,J]
Market prices indicate shortages and gluts, and where the profits are to be made [Wolff,J]
Utilitarians might say property ownership encourages the best use of the land [Wolff,J]
Either Difference allows unequal liberty, or Liberty makes implementing Difference impossible [Wolff,J]
Rights and justice are only the last resorts of a society, something to fall back on [Wolff,J]
Should love be the first virtue of a society, as it is of the family? [Wolff,J]