more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 20490

[filed under theme 24. Political Theory / B. Nature of a State / 2. State Legitimacy / c. Social contract ]

Full Idea

On the utilitarian account the state is justified if and only if it produces more happiness than any alternative. Whether we consent to the state is irrelevant.

Gist of Idea

For utilitarians, consent to the state is irrelevant, if it produces more happiness

Source

Jonathan Wolff (An Introduction to Political Philosophy (Rev) [2006], 2 'Intro')

Book Ref

Wolff,Jonathan: 'An Introduction to Political Philosophy (Rev)' [OUP 2006], p.35


A Reaction

The paternalistic character of utilitarianism is a familiar problem. I quite like this approach, even though liberals will find it a bit naughty. We make children go to school, for their own good. Experts endorse society, even when citizens don't.


The 30 ideas with the same theme [power derived from agreement among citizens]:

Even the poorest have a life to lead, and so should consent to who governs them [-]
After a taste of mutual harm, men make a legal contract to avoid it [Plato]
A law is not just if it is not useful in mutual associations [Epicurus]
The Second Treatise explores the consequences of the contractual view of the state [Locke, by Scruton]
A society only begins if there is consent of all the individuals to join it [Locke]
If anyone enjoys the benefits of government (even using a road) they give tacit assent to its laws [Locke]
A politic society is created from a state of nature by a unanimous agreement [Locke]
The idea that society rests on consent or promises undermines obedience [Hume]
We no more give 'tacit assent' to the state than a passenger carried on board a ship while asleep [Hume]
The people would be amazed to learn that government arises from their consent [Hume]
The social order is a sacred right, but based on covenants, not nature [Rousseau]
The government is instituted by a law, not by a contract [Rousseau]
Kant made the social contract international and cosmopolitan [Kant, by Oksala]
Personal contracts are for some end, but a civil state contract involves a duty to share [Kant]
There must be a unanimous contract that citizens accept majority decisions [Kant]
A contract is theoretical, but it can guide rulers to make laws which the whole people will accept [Kant]
Individuals can't leave the state, because they are natural citizens, and humans require a state [Hegel]
Society isn’t founded on a contract, since contracts presuppose a society [Hegel, by Scruton]
The social contract sees society as constituted by and for individuals [Taylor,C]
Power is only legitimate if it is reasonable for free equal citizens to endorse the constitution [Rawls]
Social contracts assume equal powers among the participants [Nussbaum]
Social contract theories are usually rejected because there never was such a contract [Kymlicka]
Just visiting (and using roads) is hardly ratifying the Constitution [Sandel]
The benefits of social freedom outweigh the loneliness, doubt and alienation it brings [Scruton]
For utilitarians, consent to the state is irrelevant, if it produces more happiness [Wolff,J]
Social contract theory has the attracton of including everyone, and being voluntary [Wolff,J]
Maybe voting in elections is a grant of legitimacy to the winners [Wolff,J]
A social contract limits the pursuit of justice to members of a single society [Sen]
Social contracts and markets have made society seem disconnected and artificial [Aho]
Hypothetical contracts have no binding force [Swift]