more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 19787

[filed under theme 24. Political Theory / B. Nature of a State / 2. State Legitimacy / a. Sovereignty ]

Full Idea

Citizens allow themselves to be oppressed only insofar as they are driven by blind ambition; ...they consent to wear chains in order to be able to give them in turn to others. It is difficult to reduce to obedience someone who does not wish to command.

Gist of Idea

People accept the right to be commanded, because they themselves wish to command

Source

Jean-Jacques Rousseau (Discourse on the Origin of Inequality [1754], Part II)

Book Ref

Rousseau,Jean-Jacques: 'The Basic Political Writings', ed/tr. Cress,Donald A. [Hackett 1987], p.77


A Reaction

Beautiful. This produces what I call the 'military model of management', where people love tree diagrams showing chains of command, and their place in the hierarchy. Life becomes 'either give orders, or obey'. I like democratic teams.


The 12 ideas with the same theme [rightful power over citizens]:

Hobbes says the people voluntarily give up their sovereignty, in a contract with a ruler [Hobbes, by Oksala]
Sovereignty must include the power to make people submit to it [Spinoza]
People accept the right to be commanded, because they themselves wish to command [Rousseau]
Rousseau insists that popular sovereignty needs a means of expressing consent [Rousseau, by Oksala]
Sovereignty is the exercise of the general will, which can never be delegated [Rousseau]
Just as people control their limbs, the general-will state has total control of its members [Rousseau]
Political laws are fundamental, as they firmly organise the state - but they could still be changed [Rousseau]
The sovereignty does not appoint the leaders [Rousseau]
States only have full authority if they heed the claims of human fellowship [Green,TH]
Liberal state legitimacy is based on a belief in justice, not in some conception of the good life [Kymlicka]
Nowadays sovereignty (once the basis of a state) has become relative [Reybrouck]
Unjust institutions may be seen as just; are they legitimate if just but seen as unjust? [Tuckness/Wolf]