more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 21947

[filed under theme 24. Political Theory / C. Ruling a State / 4. Changing the State / a. Centralisation ]

Full Idea

Foucault's analysis suggests that meaningful revolution, hence genuine liberation, is impossible: the only alternative to the modern net of micro-centres of power is totalitatian domination. Hence his politics, even when revolutionary, is always local.

Gist of Idea

Power is localised, so we either have totalitarian centralisation, or local politics

Source

report of Michel Foucault (Discipline and Punish [1977]) by Gary Gutting - Foucault: a very short introduction 8

Book Ref

Gutting,Gary: 'Foucault' [OUP 2005], p.88


A Reaction

It is hard to disagree with this.


The 5 ideas with the same theme [increasing control by a dominant group]:

In Europe it is thought that local government is best handled centrally [Tocqueville]
The upholding of the military state is needed to maintain the strong human type [Nietzsche]
No central authority can initiate decentralisation [Weil]
Power is localised, so we either have totalitarian centralisation, or local politics [Foucault, by Gutting]
Big central government only exists as a focus for anger - not to act [Fisher]