more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
Reading the 'Ethics' is so disappointing, because Aristotle does not try to convince us that we really ought to do what our non-reflective consciousness has hitherto believed we ought to do.
Gist of Idea
The 'Ethics' is disappointing, because it fails to try to justify our duties
Source
H.A. Prichard (Does moral phil rest on a mistake? [1912])
Book Ref
Prichard,H.A.: 'Moral Writings' [OUP 2002], p.17
A Reaction
Aristotle didn't speak the language of 'duty' (see Idea 2172), but he could work it into his account if Prichard asked nicely. I take the truly virtuous person to be, above all, a wonderful citizen. Duties are contractual; good deeds flow from virtue.
Related Idea
Idea 2172 The modern idea of duty is unknown in archaic Greece [Williams,B]
9261 | The 'Ethics' is disappointing, because it fails to try to justify our duties [Prichard] |
9262 | The mistake is to think we can prove what can only be seen directly in moral thinking [Prichard] |
9260 | Virtues won't generate an obligation, so it isn't a basis for morality [Prichard] |
9259 | We feel obligations to overcome our own failings, and these are not relations to other people [Prichard] |
9258 | If pain were instrinsically wrong, it would be immoral to inflict it on ourselves [Prichard] |