more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 3162

[filed under theme 16. Persons / C. Self-Awareness / 4. Errors in Introspection ]

Full Idea

Experiments have shown (Nisbett and Wilson 1977) that people's introspective knowledge is a lot less reliable than they suppose. People are sensitive to but entirely unaware of many factors that influence their social behaviour.

Gist of Idea

Experiments prove that people are often unaware of their motives

Source

Georges Rey (Contemporary Philosophy of Mind [1997], 3.2.2)

Book Ref

Rey,Georges: 'Contemporary Philosophy of Mind' [Blackwell 1997], p.84


A Reaction

This type of observation rests on an overemphasis on the conscious mind. We are not conscious of liver events, or of deep buried brain events, both of which motivate us. We should only expect introspection to reveal what is fully conscious.


The 5 ideas with the same theme [misleading information that can come from introspection]:

We can be ignorant about ourselves, for example, our desires and motives [Audi,R]
Experiments prove that people are often unaware of their motives [Rey]
Brain damage makes the unreliability of introspection obvious [Rey]
When distracted we can totally misjudge our own experiences [Chalmers]
Error must be possible in introspection, because error is possible in all judgements [Heil]