more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 21041

[filed under theme 25. Social Practice / D. Justice / 1. Basis of justice ]

Full Idea

The natural distribution is neither just nor unjust; nor is it unjust that persons are born into society at some particular position. These are simply natural facts. What is just and unjust is the way that institutions deal with these facts.

Gist of Idea

Justice concerns not natural distributions, or our born location, but what we do about them

Source

John Rawls (A Theory of Justice [1972], 17)

Book Ref

Rawls,John: 'A Theory of Justice' [OUP 1978], p.102


A Reaction

Lovely quotation. There is no point in railing against the given, and that includes what is given by history, as well as what is given by nature. It comes down to intervening, in history and in nature. How much intervention will individuals tolerate?


The 19 ideas from John Rawls

The maximisation of happiness must be done fairly [Rawls, by Smart]
Rawls rejected cosmopolitanism because it doesn't respect the autonomy of 'peoples' [Rawls, by Shorten]
In a pluralist society we can't expect a community united around one conception of the good [Rawls]
Power is only legitimate if it is reasonable for free equal citizens to endorse the constitution [Rawls]
Check your rationality by thinking of your opinion pronounced by the supreme court [Rawls]
The original position models the idea that citizens start as free and equal [Rawls, by Swift]
Why does the rational agreement of the 'Original Position' in Rawls make it right? [Nagel on Rawls]
Rawls defends the priority of right over good [Rawls, by Finlayson]
A fair arrangement is one that parties can agree to without knowing how it will benefit them personally [Rawls, by Williams,B]
Utilitarians lump persons together; Rawls somewhat separates them; Nozick wholly separates them [Swift on Rawls]
Rawls's account of justice relies on conventional fairness, avoiding all moral controversy [Gray on Rawls]
The social contract has problems with future generations, national boundaries, disabilities and animals [Rawls, by Nussbaum]
Choose justice principles in ignorance of your own social situation [Rawls]
All desirable social features should be equal, unless inequality favours the disadvantaged [Rawls]
Justice concerns not natural distributions, or our born location, but what we do about them [Rawls]
Liberty Principle: everyone has an equal right to liberties, if compatible with others' liberties [Rawls]
Human injustice is not a permanent feature of communities [Rawls]
If an aggression is unjust, the constraints on how it is fought are much stricter [Rawls]
Utilitarianism inappropriately scales up the individual willingness to make sacrifices [Rawls, by Nagel]