more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 20479

[filed under theme 25. Social Practice / E. Policies / 1. War / c. Combatants ]

Full Idea

How many soldiers put themselves at risk every day in wars which they care little about, rushing into danger in battles the loss of which will not make them lose a night's sleep. Meanwhile a man at home is more passionate about the war than the soldier.

Gist of Idea

People at home care far more than soldiers risking death about the outcome of wars

Source

Michel de Montaigne (III.10 On Restraining your Will [1580], p.1139)

Book Ref

Montaigne,Michel de: 'The Complete Essays', ed/tr. Screech,M.A. [Penguin 1987], p.1139


A Reaction

It depends whether you are a mercenary (which the majority probably were in 1680), and what are the implications of defeat.


The 18 ideas with the same theme [role and ethics of the fighters]:

Princes should not justify a war to their subjects, and doing so would undermine the state [Vitoria]
People at home care far more than soldiers risking death about the outcome of wars [Montaigne]
I act justly if I follow my Prince in an apparently unjust war, and refusing to fight would be injustice [Hobbes]
Wars are between States, not people, and the individuals are enemies by accident [Rousseau]
Hiring soldiers is to use them as instruments, ignoring their personal rights [Kant]
Even aggressor soldiers are not criminals, so they have equal rights with their opponents [Walzer]
The duties and moral status of loyal and obedient soldiers is the same in defence and aggression [Walzer]
We can't blame soldiers for anything they do which clearly promotes victory [Walzer]
Rejecting Combatant Equality allows just soldiers to be harsher, even to the extreme [Walzer]
Kidnapped sailors and volunteers have different obligations to the passengers [Walzer]
If all combatants are seen as morally equal, that facilitates starting unjust wars [McMahan]
You don't become a legitimate target, just because you violently resist an unjust attack [McMahan]
Volunteer soldiers accept the risk of attack, but they don't agree to it, or to their deaths [McMahan]
Soldiers cannot know enough facts to evaluate the justice of their war [McMahan]
If being part of a big collective relieves soldiers of moral responsibility, why not the leaders too? [McMahan]
If soldiers can't refuse to fight in unjust wars, can they choose to fight in just wars? [McMahan]
Equality is both sides have permission, or both sides are justified, or one justified the other permitted [McMahan]
Fighting unjustly under duress does not justify it, or permit it, but it may excuse it [McMahan]