more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 13788

[filed under theme 9. Objects / F. Identity among Objects / 7. Indiscernible Objects ]

Full Idea

Soc: Suppose we made a duplicate of everything you have and put it beside you; would there then be two Cratyluses, or Cratylus and an image of Cratylus? Crat: It seems to me, Socrates, that there would be two Cratyluses.

Gist of Idea

If we made a perfect duplicate of Cratylus, there would be two Cratyluses

Source

Plato (Cratylus [c.377 BCE], 432c)

Book Ref

Plato: 'Complete Works', ed/tr. Cooper,John M. [Hackett 1997], p.148


A Reaction

Don't think that science fiction examples are a modern development in philosophy. Plato has just invented the Startrek transporter. The two Cratyluses are the two spheres in Max Black's famous example.

Related Idea

Idea 10195 If the universe just held two indiscernibles spheres, that refutes the Identity of Indiscernibles [Black]


The 19 ideas from 'Cratylus'

Truths say of what is that it is, falsehoods say of what is that it is not [Plato]
Is the being or essence of each thing private to each person? [Plato]
Things don't have every attribute, and essence isn't private, so each thing has an essence [Plato]
We only succeed in cutting if we use appropriate tools, not if we approach it randomly [Plato]
A name is a sort of tool [Plato]
A dialectician is someone who knows how to ask and to answer questions [Plato]
The natural offspring of a lion is called a 'lion' (but what about the offspring of a king?) [Plato]
Good people are no different from wise ones [Plato]
Soul causes the body to live, and gives it power to breathe and to be revitalized [Plato]
Even the gods love play [Plato]
'Arete' signifies lack of complexity and a free-flowing soul [Plato]
Wisdom is called 'beautiful', because it performs fine works [Plato]
Doesn't each thing have an essence, just as it has other qualities? [Plato]
If we made a perfect duplicate of Cratylus, there would be two Cratyluses [Plato]
Anyone who knows a thing's name also knows the thing [Plato]
A name-giver might misname something, then force other names to conform to it [Plato]
Things must be known before they are named, so it can't be the names that give us knowledge [Plato]
How can beauty have identity if it changes? [Plato]
There can't be any knowledge if things are constantly changing [Plato]