more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 3205

[filed under theme 19. Language / A. Nature of Meaning / 7. Meaning Holism / b. Language holism ]

Full Idea

Semantic holism is a desperate measure. Belief content would be continually changed by new beliefs, evidence for a belief would change the target belief, and no two people would ever agree on concepts.

Gist of Idea

Semantic holism means new evidence for a belief changes the belief, and we can't agree on concepts

Source

Georges Rey (Contemporary Philosophy of Mind [1997], 9.1.2)

Book Ref

Rey,Georges: 'Contemporary Philosophy of Mind' [Blackwell 1997], p.240


A Reaction

It is far more plausible to say language is a bit on the holistic side. Total holism is mad.


The 16 ideas with the same theme [meaning always involves an entire language]:

Holism says all language use is also a change in the rules of language [Frege, by Dummett]
To understand a sentence means to understand a language [Wittgenstein]
There is an attempt to give a verificationist account of meaning, without the error of reducing everything to sensations [Dennett on Quine]
Meaning holism tried to show that you can't get fixed meanings built out of observation terms [Putnam]
Understanding a sentence involves background knowledge and can't be done in isolation [Putnam]
Holism seems to make fixed definition more or less impossible [Putnam]
Can meanings remain the same when beliefs change? [Rorty]
The pattern of sentences held true gives sentences their meaning [Davidson]
If to understand "fish" you must know facts about them, where does that end? [Fodor]
For holists no two thoughts are ever quite the same, which destroys faith in meaning [Fodor]
If the meanings of sentences depend on other sentences, how did we learn language? [Dancy,J]
Meaning holism is a crazy doctrine [Fodor]
Holism cannot give a coherent account of scientific methodology [Wright,C, by Miller,A]
Semantic holism means new evidence for a belief changes the belief, and we can't agree on concepts [Rey]
If some inferences are needed to fix meaning, but we don't know which, they are all relevant [Fodor/Lepore, by Boghossian]
To understand 'birds warble' and 'tigers growl', you must also understand 'tigers warble' [Heil]