more from this thinker
|
more from this text
Single Idea 4878
[filed under theme 17. Mind and Body / E. Mind as Physical / 7. Anti-Physicalism / b. Multiple realisability
]
Full Idea
I think there are only two good reasons why, when you make a mind, the materials matter: speed, and the ubiquity of transducers and effectors throughout the nervous system.
Clarification
These will add and change information
Gist of Idea
The materials for a mind only matter because of speed, and a need for transducers and effectors
Source
Daniel C. Dennett (Kinds of Minds [1996], Ch.3)
Book Ref
Dennett,Daniel C.: 'Kinds of Minds' [Phoenix 1997], p.100
A Reaction
This sounds roughly right, because it gives you something between multiple realisability (minds made of cans and string), and type-type identity (minds ARE a particular material). Call it 'biological functionalism'?
The
24 ideas
with the same theme
[lots of way to implement a thought]:
|
6376
|
Neuroscience does not support multiple realisability, and tends to support identity
[Polger on Putnam]
|
|
2330
|
If humans and molluscs both feel pain, it can't be a single biological state
[Putnam, by Kim]
|
|
7432
|
One mental role might be filled by a variety of physical types
[Armstrong]
|
|
3429
|
Multiple realisability was worse news for physicalism than anomalous monism was
[Davidson, by Kim]
|
|
3497
|
If mind is multiply realisable, it is possible that anything could realise it
[Searle]
|
|
6992
|
If different states can fulfil the same role, the converse must also be possible
[Jackson]
|
|
2322
|
Multiple realisation applies to other species, and even one individual over time
[Kim]
|
|
4892
|
If physicalists stick with identity (not supervenience), Martian pain will not be like ours
[Perry]
|
|
7443
|
A theory must be mixed, to cover qualia without behaviour, and behaviour without qualia
[Lewis, by PG]
|
|
4878
|
The materials for a mind only matter because of speed, and a need for transducers and effectors
[Dennett]
|
|
2579
|
Physicalism is prejudiced in favour of our neurology, when other systems might have minds
[Block]
|
|
2598
|
Lots of physical properties are multiply realisable, so why shouldn't beliefs be?
[Fodor]
|
|
3981
|
Most psychological properties seem to be multiply realisable
[Fodor]
|
|
3512
|
If a mental state is multiply realisable, why does it lead to similar behaviour?
[Papineau]
|
|
4985
|
If mental states are multiply realisable, they could not be translated into physical terms
[Kirk,R]
|
|
3185
|
Multiple realisability rules out hidden essences and experts as the source of water- and gold-concepts
[McGinn]
|
|
6542
|
A Martian may exhibit human-like behaviour while having very different sensations
[Lycan]
|
|
2429
|
Temperature (etc.) is agreed to be reducible, but it is multiply realisable
[Chalmers]
|
|
7043
|
Multiple realisability is actually one predicate applying to a diverse range of properties
[Heil]
|
|
4619
|
'Multiple realisability' needs to clearly distinguish low-level realisers from what is realised
[Heil]
|
|
4620
|
Multiple realisability is not a relation among properties, but an application of predicates to resembling things
[Heil]
|
|
4933
|
Consciousness is a process, not a thing, as it maintains unity as its composition changes
[Edelman/Tononi]
|
|
7734
|
Maybe a mollusc's brain events for pain ARE of the same type (broadly) as a human's
[PG]
|
|
7735
|
Maybe a frog's brain events for fear are functionally like ours, but not phenomenally
[PG]
|