more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 19162

[filed under theme 19. Language / A. Nature of Meaning / 6. Meaning as Use ]

Full Idea

Meaning depends on use, but it is not easy to say how, for uses to which we may put the utterance of a sentence are endless while its meaning remains fixed.

Gist of Idea

Meaning involves use, but a sentence has many uses, while meaning stays fixed

Source

Donald Davidson (Truth and Predication [2005], 6)

Book Ref

Davidson,Donald: 'Truth and Predication' [Belknap Harvard 2005], p.123


A Reaction

Quite so. The password is 'Swordfish' (or 'Sweet marjoram', if you prefer).


The 32 ideas from 'Truth and Predication'

We recognise sentences at once as linguistic units; we then figure out their parts [Davidson]
Top-down semantic analysis must begin with truth, as it is obvious, and explains linguistic usage [Davidson]
If you assign semantics to sentence parts, the sentence fails to compose a whole [Davidson]
Many say that Tarski's definitions fail to connect truth to meaning [Davidson]
Tarski does not tell us what his various truth predicates have in common [Davidson]
Truth is the basic concept, because Convention-T is agreed to fix the truths of a language [Davidson]
'Satisfaction' is a generalised form of reference [Davidson]
Antirealism about truth prevents its use as an intersubjective standard [Davidson]
'Epistemic' truth depends what rational creatures can verify [Davidson]
There is nothing interesting or instructive for truths to correspond to [Davidson]
Coherence truth says a consistent set of sentences is true - which ties truth to belief [Davidson]
Satisfaction is a sort of reference, so maybe we can define truth in terms of reference? [Davidson]
We can explain truth in terms of satisfaction - but also explain satisfaction in terms of truth [Davidson]
If we reject corresponding 'facts', we should also give up the linked idea of 'representations' [Davidson]
Probability can be constrained by axioms, but that leaves open its truth nature [Davidson]
Utterances have the truth conditions intended by the speaker [Davidson]
The principle of charity says an interpreter must assume the logical constants [Davidson]
Truth is basic and clear, so don't try to replace it with something simpler [Davidson]
Modern predicates have 'places', and are sentences with singular terms deleted from the places [Davidson]
'Humanity belongs to Socrates' is about humanity, so it's a different proposition from 'Socrates is human' [Davidson]
We indicate use of a metaphor by its obvious falseness, or trivial truth [Davidson]
Meaning involves use, but a sentence has many uses, while meaning stays fixed [Davidson]
You only understand an order if you know what it is to obey it [Davidson]
A comprehensive theory of truth probably includes a theory of predication [Davidson]
Two sentences can be rephrased by equivalent substitutions to correspond to the same thing [Davidson]
The Slingshot assumes substitutions give logical equivalence, and thus identical correspondence [Davidson]
Axioms spell out sentence satisfaction. With no free variables, all sequences satisfy the truths [Davidson]
To define a class of true sentences is to stipulate a possible language [Davidson]
The concept of truth can explain predication [Davidson]
Treating predicates as sets drops the predicate for a new predicate 'is a member of', which is no help [Davidson]
Tarski is not a disquotationalist, because you can assign truth to a sentence you can't quote [Davidson]
Predicates are a source of generality in sentences [Davidson]