more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 20055

[filed under theme 20. Action / C. Motives for Action / 3. Acting on Reason / c. Reasons as causes ]

Full Idea

The idea running through the work of Aristotle, Kant, Anscombe and Davidson is that explanation of action involves justifying that action or making it rationally intelligible.

Gist of Idea

A standard view says that the explanation of an action is showing its rational justification

Source

Rowland Stout (Action [2005], 5 'Psychological')

Book Ref

Stout,Rowland: 'Action' [Acumen 2005], p.69


A Reaction

Stout goes on to say that instead you could give the 'rationalisation' of the action, which is psychological facts which explain the action, without justifying it. The earlier view may seem a little optimistic and intellectualist.


The 22 ideas with the same theme [reasons have a distinct causal role in actions]:

Our reasoned acts are held to be voluntary and our own doing [Aristotle]
We assign the cause of someone's walking when we say why they are doing it [Aristotle]
Motivation is causality seen from within [Schopenhauer]
I want to suppress in myself the normal reasons people have for action [Cioran]
It is an odd Humean view to think a reason to act must always involve caring [Foot]
The best explanation of reasons as purposes for actions is that they are causal [Davidson, by Smith,M]
Reasons can give purposes to actions, without actually causing them [Smith,M on Davidson]
Early Davidson says intentional action is caused by reasons [Davidson, by Stout,R]
Reasons must be causes when agents act 'for' reasons [Davidson, by Lowe]
Davidson claims that what causes an action is the reason for doing it [Davidson, by Kim]
Deviant causal chain: a reason causes an action, but isn't the reason for which it was performed [Davidson, by Neta]
Reasons are 'internal' if they give a person a motive to act, but 'external' otherwise [Williams,B]
Explaining an action is showing that it is rational [Newton-Smith]
Actions are not mere effects of reasons, but are under their control [Audi,R]
We feel belief and desire as reasons for choice, not causes of choice [Lowe]
Rational decisions are either taken to be based on evidence, or to be explained causally [Conee/Feldman]
Beliefs, desires and intentions are not events, so can't figure in causal relations [Stout,R]
A standard view says that the explanation of an action is showing its rational justification [Stout,R]
In order to be causal, an agent's reasons must be internalised as psychological states [Stout,R]
It is generally assumed that reason explanations are causal [Wilson/Schpall]
Causalists allow purposive explanations, but then reduce the purpose to the action's cause [Wilson/Schpall]
Rather than requiring an action, a reason may 'entice' us, or be 'eligible', or 'justify' it [Orsi]