more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 5423

[filed under theme 3. Truth / D. Coherence Truth / 2. Coherence Truth Critique ]

Full Idea

If the law of contradiction itself were subjected to the test of coherence, we should find that, if we choose to suppose it false, nothing will any longer be incoherent with anything else.

Gist of Idea

If we suspend the law of contradiction, nothing will appear to be incoherent

Source

Bertrand Russell (Problems of Philosophy [1912], Ch.12)

Book Ref

Russell,Bertrand: 'The Problems of Philosophy' [OUP 1995], p.71


A Reaction

Russell is in error in treating coherence as if it was merely non-contradiction. If I see you as four feet tall today and six feet tall tomorrow, that is incoherent (to me) but not an actual contradiction. All accounts of truth need presuppositions.


The 8 ideas with the same theme [criticism of the coherence theory of truth]:

More than one coherent body of beliefs seems possible [Russell]
If we suspend the law of contradiction, nothing will appear to be incoherent [Russell]
Coherence is not the meaning of truth, but an important test for truth [Russell]
Even with a tight account of coherence, there is always the possibility of more than one set of coherent propositions [Dancy,J]
The coherence theory of truth implies idealism, because facts are just coherent beliefs [McGinn]
Any coherent set of beliefs can be made more coherent by adding some false beliefs [Engel]
The coherence theory allows multiple coherent wholes, which could contradict one another [Horsten]
How do you identify the best coherence set; and aren't there truths which don't cohere? [Young,JO]