more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 6021

[filed under theme 3. Truth / A. Truth Problems / 5. Truth Bearers ]

Full Idea

It is only when we say a proposition that we speak truly or falsely.

Gist of Idea

It is only when we say a proposition that we speak truly or falsely

Source

Sextus Empiricus (Against the Professors (six books) [c.180], 8.74)

Book Ref

'The Hellenistic Philosophers:Vol.1 translations', ed/tr. Long,A. /Sedley,D. [CUP 1987], p.203


A Reaction

This makes assertions truth-bearers, rather than propositions. But a proposition can be true or false if it is stamped with a date and/or place. "Shakespeare was born in Stratford on 23rd April 1664". No one needs to assert that.


The 73 ideas from Sextus Empiricus

Reasoning is impossible without a preconception [Sext.Empiricus]
Saying the good is useful or choiceworth or happiness-creating is not the good, but a feature of it [Sext.Empiricus]
Like a warming fire, what is good by nature should be good for everyone [Sext.Empiricus]
If a desire is itself desirable, then we shouldn't desire it, as achieving it destroys it [Sext.Empiricus]
Fools, infants and madmen may speak truly, but do not know [Sext.Empiricus]
Madmen are reliable reporters of what appears to them [Sext.Empiricus]
Some properties are inseparable from a thing, such as the length, breadth and depth of a body [Sext.Empiricus]
We can only dream of a winged man if we have experienced men and some winged thing [Sext.Empiricus]
Ordinary speech is not exact about what is true; we say we are digging a well before the well exists [Sext.Empiricus]
How can sceptics show there is no criterion? Weak without, contradiction with [Sext.Empiricus]
Some things are their own criterion, such as straightness, a set of scales, or light [Sext.Empiricus]
Gods were invented as watchers of people's secret actions [Sext.Empiricus]
All men agree that God is blessed, imperishable, happy and good [Sext.Empiricus]
It is mad to think that what is useful to us, like lakes and rivers, are gods [Sext.Empiricus]
The perfections of God were extrapolations from mankind [Sext.Empiricus]
God is defended by agreement, order, absurdity of denying God, and refutations [Sext.Empiricus]
The original substance lacked motion or shape, and was given these by a cause [Sext.Empiricus]
God's sensations imply change, and hence perishing, which is absurd, so there is no such God [Sext.Empiricus]
The Divine must lack the virtues of continence and fortitude, because they are not needed [Sext.Empiricus]
An incorporeal God could do nothing, and a bodily god would perish, so there is no God [Sext.Empiricus]
God must suffer to understand suffering [Sext.Empiricus]
God without virtue is absurd, but God's virtues will be better than God [Sext.Empiricus]
The incorporeal is not in the nature of body, and so could not emerge from it [Sext.Empiricus]
Socrates either dies when he exists (before his death) or when he doesn't (after his death) [Sext.Empiricus]
Parts are not parts if their whole is nothing more than the parts [Sext.Empiricus]
If we try to conceive of a line with no breadth, it ceases to exist, and so has no length [Sext.Empiricus]
A man walking backwards on a forwards-moving ship is moving in a fixed place [Sext.Empiricus]
Some say motion is perceived by sense, but others say it is by intellect [Sext.Empiricus]
Time doesn't end with the Universe, because tensed statements about destruction remain true [Sext.Empiricus]
Time is divisible, into past, present and future [Sext.Empiricus]
If the present is just the limit of the past or the future, it can't exist because they don't exist [Sext.Empiricus]
'Man is a rational mortal animal' is equivalent to 'if something is a man, that thing is a rational mortal animal' [Sext.Empiricus]
Right actions, once done, are those with a reasonable justification [Sext.Empiricus]
The tektraktys (1+2+3+4=10) is the 'fount of ever-flowing nature' [Sext.Empiricus]
How can you investigate without some preconception of your object? [Sext.Empiricus]
It is only when we say a proposition that we speak truly or falsely [Sext.Empiricus]
Water that seems lukewarm can seem very hot on inflamed skin [Sext.Empiricus]
Sickness is perfectly natural to the sick, so their natural perceptions should carry some weight [Sext.Empiricus]
Some actions seem shameful when sober but not when drunk [Sext.Empiricus]
The same oar seems bent in water and straight when out of it [Sext.Empiricus]
The basis of scepticism is the claim that every proposition has an equal opposing proposition [Sext.Empiricus]
The necks of doves appear different in colour depending on the angle of viewing [Sext.Empiricus]
Whether honey is essentially sweet may be doubted, as it is a matter of judgement rather than appearance [Sext.Empiricus]
The same tower appears round from a distance, but square close at hand [Sext.Empiricus]
If we press the side of an eyeball, objects appear a different shape [Sext.Empiricus]
How can we judge between our impressions and those of other animals, when we ourselves are involved? [Sext.Empiricus]
If we enjoy different things, presumably we receive different impressions [Sext.Empiricus]
If we had no hearing or sight, we would assume no sound or sight exists, so there may be unsensed qualities [Sext.Empiricus]
If we utter three steps of a logical argument, they never exist together [Sext.Empiricus]
A valid hypothetical syllogism is 'that which does not begin with a truth and end with a falsehood' [Sext.Empiricus]
Proof moves from agreed premises to a non-evident inference [Sext.Empiricus]
If you don't view every particular, you may miss the one which disproves your universal induction [Sext.Empiricus]
You cannot divide anything into many parts, because after the first division you are no longer dividing the original [Sext.Empiricus]
If an argument has an absurd conclusion, we should not assent to the absurdity, but avoid the absurd argument [Sext.Empiricus]
We distinguish ambiguities by seeing what is useful [Sext.Empiricus]
How can the intellect know if sensation is reliable if it doesn't directly see external objects? [Sext.Empiricus]
Since Socrates either died when he was alive (a contradiction) or died when he was dead (meaningless), he didn't die [Sext.Empiricus]
Some say that causes are physical, some say not [Sext.Empiricus]
If motion and rest are abolished, so is time [Sext.Empiricus]
Time must be unlimited, but past and present can't be non-existent, and can't be now, so time does not exist [Sext.Empiricus]
How can time be divisible if we can't compare one length of time with another? [Sext.Empiricus]
Causes are either equal to the effect, or they link equally with other causes, or they contribute slightly [Sext.Empiricus]
If there were no causes then everything would have been randomly produced by everything [Sext.Empiricus]
With us it is shameful for men to wear earrings, but among Syrians it is considered noble [Sext.Empiricus]
Knowing an effect results from a cause means knowing that the cause belongs with the effect, which is circular [Sext.Empiricus]
Even if all known nations agree on a practice, there may be unknown nations which disagree [Sext.Empiricus]
Cause can't exist before effect, or exist at the same time, so it doesn't exist [Sext.Empiricus]
How can we agree on the concept of God, unless we agree on his substance or form or place? [Sext.Empiricus]
The existence of God can't be self-evident or everyone would have agreed on it, so it needs demonstration [Sext.Empiricus]
Does the original self-mover push itself from behind, or pull itself from in front? [Sext.Empiricus]
If time and place are infinitely divided, it becomes impossible for movement ever to begin [Sext.Empiricus]
If all atoms, times and places are the same, everything should move with equal velocity [Sext.Empiricus]
If God foresaw evil he would presumably prevent it, and if he only foresees some things, why those things? [Sext.Empiricus]