16771 | A composite is a true unity if all of its parts fall under one essence [Scheibler] |
6472 | Continuity is a sufficient criterion for the identity of a rock, but not for part of a smooth fluid [Russell] |
16939 | Mass terms just concern spread, but other terms involve both spread and individuation [Quine] |
15319 | Hard individual blocks don't fix what 'things' are; fluids are no less material things [Harré/Madden] |
15501 | We have no idea of a third sort of thing, that isn't an individual, a class, or their mixture [Lewis] |
15504 | Atomless gunk is an individual whose parts all have further proper parts [Lewis] |
17578 | I reject talk of 'stuff', and treat it in terms of particles [Inwagen] |
12793 | Early pre-Socratics had a mass-noun ontology, which was replaced by count-nouns [Benardete,JA] |
13386 | If objects are just conventional, there is no ontological distinction between stuff and things [Jubien] |
13488 | Mass words do not have plurals, or numerical adjectives, or use 'fewer' [Hart,WD] |
15014 | Unlike things, stuff obeys unrestricted composition and mereological essentialism [Sider] |
12847 | Mass nouns admit 'much' and 'a little', and resist 'many' and 'few'. [Simons] |
12863 | Mass terms (unlike plurals) are used with indifference to whether they can exist in units [Simons] |
12862 | Gold is not its atoms, because the atoms must be all gold, but gold contains neutrons [Simons] |
12792 | The category of stuff does not suit reference [Laycock] |
12799 | Descriptions of stuff are neither singular aggregates nor plural collections [Laycock] |
17436 | We talk of snow as what stays the same, when it is a heap or drift or expanse [Koslicki] |