17852 | A thing has a feature necessarily if its denial brings a contradiction [Aristotle] |
12259 | Reasoning is when some results follow necessarily from certain claims [Aristotle] |
16490 | Some facts about experience feel like logical necessities [Russell] |
9001 | Frege moved Kant's question about a priori synthetic to 'how is logical certainty possible?' [Quine] |
12188 | Contrary to some claims, Quine does not deny logical necessity [Quine, by McFetridge] |
15230 | Logical necessity is grounded in the logical form of a statement [Harré/Madden] |
13820 | The idea that anything which can be proved is necessary has a problem with empty names [Bostock] |
15083 | The fundamental case of logical necessity is the valid conclusion of an inference [McFetridge, by Hale] |
15084 | In the McFetridge view, logical necessity means a consequent must be true if the antecedent is [McFetridge, by Hale] |
12180 | Logical necessity requires that a valid argument be necessary [McFetridge] |
12181 | Traditionally, logical necessity is the strongest, and entails any other necessities [McFetridge] |
12183 | It is only logical necessity if there is absolutely no sense in which it could be false [McFetridge] |
12184 | Logical necessity overrules all other necessities [McFetridge] |
12192 | The mark of logical necessity is deduction from any suppositions whatever [McFetridge] |
12189 | Logical necessity involves a decision about usage, and is non-realist and non-cognitive [Wright,C, by McFetridge] |
14681 | Logical necessity is free of constraints, and may accommodate all of S5 logic [Salmon,N] |
13394 | Entailment does not result from mutual necessity; mutual necessity ensures entailment [Jubien] |
12185 | Logical necessity is epistemic necessity, which is the old notion of a priori [Edgington, by McFetridge] |
10258 | Logical modalities may be acceptable, because they are reducible to satisfaction in models [Shapiro] |
15417 | Logical necessity has two sides - validity and demonstrability - which coincide in classical logic [Burgess] |
15419 | General consensus is S5 for logical modality of validity, and S4 for proof [Burgess] |
12206 | Broadly logical necessity (i.e. not necessarily formal logical necessity) is an epistemic notion [Edgington] |
12208 | An argument is only valid if it is epistemically (a priori) necessary [Edgington] |
8260 | Logical necessity can be 'strict' (laws), or 'narrow' (laws and definitions), or 'broad' (all logical worlds) [Lowe] |
16973 | Explain logical necessity by logical consequence, or the other way around? [Correia] |
15085 | 'Broadly' logical necessities are derived (in a structure) entirely from the concepts [Hale] |
15088 | Logical necessities are true in virtue of the nature of all logical concepts [Hale] |
13709 | Logical truths must be necessary if anything is [Sider] |
19285 | Logical necessity is something which is true, no matter what else is the case [Hale] |
19287 | Maybe each type of logic has its own necessity, gradually becoming broader [Hale] |
18848 | Something may be necessary because of logic, but is that therefore a special sort of necessity? [Rosen] |
9481 | Logical necessitation is not a kind of necessity; George Orwell not being Eric Blair is not a real possibility [Bird] |
18478 | Wittgenstein's plan to show there is only logical necessity failed, because of colours [MacBride] |
11084 | Logical necessity is truth in all logically possible worlds, because of laws and concepts [Hanna] |
16042 | The metaphysically and logically possible worlds are the same, so they are the same strength [Bennett,K] |
22150 | Logical possibility needs the concepts of the proposition to be adequate [Boulter] |
18825 | S5 is the logic of logical necessity [Rumfitt] |
12193 | Logical necessity is when 'necessarily A' implies 'not-A is contradictory' [Rumfitt] |
12200 | A logically necessary statement need not be a priori, as it could be unknowable [Rumfitt] |
12202 | Narrow non-modal logical necessity may be metaphysical, but real logical necessity is not [Rumfitt] |