19123 | If soundness cannot be proved internally, 'reflection principles' be added which assert soundness [Gödel, by Halbach/Leigh] |
9719 | A proof theory is 'sound' if its valid inferences entail semantic validity [Enderton] |
10765 | Soundness would seem to be an essential requirement of a proof procedure [Tharp] |
10070 | If everything that a theory proves is true, then it is 'sound' [Smith,P] |
10086 | Soundness is true axioms and a truth-preserving proof system [Smith,P] |
10596 | A theory is 'sound' iff every theorem is true (usually from true axioms and truth-preservation) [Smith,P] |
13635 | 'Weakly sound' if every theorem is a logical truth; 'sound' if every deduction is a semantic consequence [Shapiro] |
10120 | Soundness is a semantic property, unlike the purely syntactic property of consistency [George/Velleman] |
18757 | Soundness theorems are uninformative, because they rely on soundness in their proofs [McGee] |
16341 | Normally we only endorse a theory if we believe it to be sound [Halbach] |
16344 | Soundness must involve truth; the soundness of PA certainly needs it [Halbach] |
16342 | You cannot just say all of Peano arithmetic is true, as 'true' isn't part of the system [Halbach] |